Abstract:Organizational pay transparency is a hot topic widely discussed among scholars, compensation professionals, employees, politicians and the broader public, and for good reason. Transparency (and its opposite, pay secrecy) affects many important employee judgments and perceptions, including awareness of whether one is are over- or underpaid relative to coworkers, understanding of how merit raise or incentive systems work, perceptions of being fairly paid relative to the external market, and attributions made about the organization itself (e.g., whether it is procedurally fair or not). Despite the growing interest, the pay transparency literature is still in its infancy and additional theorizing and empirical tests are needed. Overall, our symposium showcases a complementary set of papers that (1) contribute to a shared understanding of pay transparency, (2) highlight not only outcomes but also potential antecedents of pay transparency, (3) explore the boundary conditions under which pay transparency has a positive versus negative effect, (4) provide insight on individual differences in pay transparency preferences, and (5) use different research methods (e.g., field study, survey) at different levels of analysis (individual, organizational and multilevel). In bringing these studies and scholars together, we hope to contribute to community building, foster the dialog among researchers and practitioners attending the session, and contribute both theoretically and practically to the advancement of compensation research. Drivers and outcomes of different pay transparency aspects: An organization-level perspective Presenter: Alexandra Arnold; U. of Lucerne Presenter: Ingrid Fulmer; U. of South Australia Presenter: Anna Sender; U. of Lucerne Presenter: Bruno Staffelbach; U. of Zurich The impact of pay secrecy on employee turnover: A multi-level field study Presenter: Valeria Alterman; U. of Florida Presenter: Elena Belogolovsky; Cornell U. Presenter: Peter Bamberger; Tel Aviv U. Presenter: Junqi Shi; Lingnan U. / Sun Yat-sen U. Dulling the double-edged sword: Effects of pay structure transparency on commitment and performanc Presenter: Tae-Youn Park; Vanderbilt U. Presenter: Meredith Lauren Woehler; Vanderbilt U. A social comparison theory perspective on employee pay secrecy preferences Presenter: Brandon Smit; Bentley U. Presenter: Tamara Montag-Smit; Ball State U.

Effort transparency and fairness

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Pay Transparency: Advancing Theory and Empirical Knowledge

Translucent Players: Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Social Dilemmas

Using social norms to explain giving behavior

The Flexible Fairness: Equality, Earned Entitlement, and Self-Interest.

Equality, equity and incentives: An experiment

Influence of peer information and personality on social exclusion in a three‐person dictator game

Should transparency be (in-)transparent? On monitoring aversion and cooperation in teams

Interaction between social influence and payoff transparency.

A Cross-Cultural Real-Effort Experiment on Wage-Inequality Information and Performance

Emergence of Fairness Behavior Driven by Reputation-Based Voluntary Participation in Evolutionary Dictator Games

Merit norms in the ultimatum game: an experimental study of the effect of merit on individual behavior and aggregate outcomes

Extortion outperforms generosity in iterated Prisoners' Dilemma

Social norms of fairness with reputation-based role assignment in the dictator game

Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game

Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games

Fairness views and cooperation under varying levels of economic inequality

Promoting Fair Proposers, Fair Responders or Both? Cost-Efficient Interference in the Spatial Ultimatum Game

Effort-based decision making in joint action: Evidence of a sense of fairness

Onymity Promotes Cooperation in Social Dilemma Experiments