Who Prefers to Work with Whom? Trait Activation in Classroom Teams

Michael G. Anderson,R. Tett
Abstract:Trait activation theory (Tett & Burnett, 2003) predicts that individuals should prefer working with others offering cues for trait expression. Working in 3- to 6-member teams, 43 undergraduates completed a personality questionnaire and rated preference in working with each other on class projects, yielding 294 unique rater-ratee pairs. Significant rater-ratee trait interactions were obtained in 12 of 36 pairwise combinations of achievement, affiliation, autonomy, dominance, abasement, and defendence (e.g., rater affiliation by ratee dominance), with 9 of 20 hypothesized directional effects significant (p < .05). Results suggest a chain reaction of trait activation: team tasks activate ratee achievement, affiliation, and dominance, whose expressions trigger raters' trait-based reactions. Affiliative ratees were preferred by raters with abrasive traits (e.g., high defendence), suggesting that people seek coworkers offering cues to express desirable traits and avoid those provoking expression of undesirable traits. Numerous complexities involving trait expression at work offer directions for future research. [150 words]
Education,Psychology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?