Abstract:Attachment theory proposes that close relationships help us to regulate our emotions in stressful and positive situations. However, no previous studies have examined preferences for a partner's emotional response to one's own stressful and positive situations or tested whether these preferences differ based on attachment orientation. This study examines the association of attachment orientation and preferences for partners' emotional responses relative to one's own emotional responses in stressful and positive contexts among 425 United States adults who were currently in a committed relationship of ≥6 months. Data were collected in 2020. Overall, participants preferred their partners to feel and express less distress, less worry, more calm, and more hope than themselves during stressful situations and for their partners to feel and express more excitement, pride, and hope than themselves during positive situations. Higher attachment anxiety predicted preferences for partners to feel and express more distress/worry in stressful situations, whereas higher attachment avoidance predicted preferences for partners to feel and express less hope in stressful situations. Statistical interactions of attachment anxiety × attachment avoidance indicated that the combination of low attachment anxiety and high attachment avoidance (dismissing avoidance) was associated with preferences for partners to feel and express less positive emotions in positive situations, whereas the combination of high attachment anxiety and high attachment avoidance (fearful avoidance) was associated with preferences for partners to feel and express more negative emotions in stressful situations and less positive emotions in positive situations. This investigation provides novel evidence for links between attachment orientation and preferences for partners' emotional responses in two theoretically important contexts, which has implications for the nature and function of emotion regulation in close relationships. Future research is needed to determine the generalizability of these findings to more collectivist cultural contexts.

A test of the trait-consistent, affect regulation hypothesis with respect to agreeableness

Agreeableness and Its Consequences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings

Agreeableness and the self-regulation of negative affect: Findings involving the neuroticism/somatic distress relationship

Feelings as a currency of care: A role for agreeableness in emotional reactivity

Pleasurable emotions and internalizing psychopathology: A multi‐study examination of specificity and alternative explanations

Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people.

Dispositional compassion shifts social preferences in systematic ways

The Effects of Partner Extraversion and Agreeableness on Trust

More or Less Likeable: The Role of Behavior-Independent Events in the Disposition Formation Process

Trait Acceptance Buffers Aggressive Tendency by the Regulation of Anger during Social Exclusion

Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations.

(Why) Do Big Five Personality Traits Moderate Evaluative Conditioning? The Role of US Extremity and Pairing Memory

Anger and Aggression: What People Want to Feel Matters

Agreeableness as a Moderator of Interpersonal Conflict

Testing an Adaptationist Theory of Trait Covariation: Relative Bargaining Power as a Common Calibrator of an Interpersonal Syndrome

Do trait-assessed valenced emotion motives predict valenced affective states in the daily lives of university students?

Affective super-traits and/or individual patterns: a variable-centered and a person-centered approach of primary emotional aspects of personality

Positive attentional bias mediates the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and trait affect

Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses.

Attachment Orientation and Preferences for Partners' Emotional Responses in Stressful and Positive Situations

Is it okay to feel this way? Exploring the joint effect of emotional experiences and expectations on life satisfaction