Calculation of Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings With vs Without Peer Grouping

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11933
2024-05-17
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:This cross-sectional study examines Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Overall Star Rating scores with vs without the peer grouping step adopted by CMS in 2021 to ensure that star ratings reflect comparisons between hospitals with similar patterns of reported quality measures.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the impact of introducing the peer grouping step in the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating method by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Specifically, the study evaluates the effect of this method update by comparing the changes in hospital star ratings with and without the peer grouping step. The main findings of the study include: 1. After incorporating the peer grouping step, a total of 585 hospitals (19.0% of all rated hospitals) received different star ratings. 2. Among them, more hospitals received higher star ratings (517 hospitals), while only a few hospitals saw a decrease in their star ratings (68 hospitals). 3. The study also found that different types of hospitals performed differently in the peer grouping, for example, urban hospitals, non-safety-net hospitals, and hospitals with fewer beds were more likely to receive higher star ratings after the introduction of the peer grouping step. Overall, the paper argues that the peer grouping step improves the rationality of the star ratings, making comparisons among hospitals with similar characteristics more fair, and helps patients better understand the overall quality of hospitals.