Abstract:The mechanical properties of live cells are important for maintaining cell physiological functions. Many types of cells such as cancer cells, malaria-infected cells, and cells with progeria have shown altered mechanical properties. Measurement of cell mechanics becomes useful for understanding cell physiology and potentially for diagnosing diseases. A number of techniques have been applied to measuring single cell mechanical properties, among which Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a popular method. However, since this approach has an intrinsic problem of lacking contact area information, the elastic property were commonly extracted by fitting the force-displacement curve acquired from AFM indentation using a Hertzian contact model, which leads to inaccurate measurement as cell-probe contact violates the assumptions of Hertzian model (rigid body contact, no adhesion). An ideal approach to quantify cell's elastic property is direct compression or tensile testing which does not rely on any contact mechanics models with assumptions that cells might not be eligible for. Here, we quantified the elastic property of live cells directly from stress-strain curves by compression test using an integrated system of a confocal microscope and an AFM with a tip-less cantilever. The contact area was measured by confocal microscope and quantified by image processing, then used to convert force to stress. The Young's modulus of T24 cells was determined directly from the slope of stress-strain curves as 0.88±0.12 kPa. In comparison, we also applied previous indentation method and contact mechanics model fitting (Hertz model, Kevin-Voigt model, Standard Linear Solid model, all with Hertzian contact assumptions). The results obtained through each model were 1.54±0.21 kPa, 2.30±0.448 kPa, 1.80±0.32 kPa, respectively (pairwise P<0.05); and the Young's modulus from the three models showed error of 78%±26%, 164%±50%, 105%±21%, compared with our direct stress-strain characterization of the same 10 cells.

Single cell mechanics analyzed by atomic force microscopy and finite element simulation

Finite Element Modelling of Single Cell Based on Atomic Force Microscope Indentation Method

A novel approach for extracting viscoelastic parameters of living cells through combination of inverse finite element simulation and Atomic Force Microscopy

Direct Characterization of Stress-Strain Relationship for Quantifying Single Cell Elasticity

Evaluation of Stem Cell-to-Tenocyte Differentiation by Atomic Force Microscopy to Measure Cellular Elastic Moduli

Probing Local Cellular Mechanics by Atomic Force Microscopy with Modified Spherical Tip

Are elastic moduli of biological cells depth dependent or not? Another explanation using a contact mechanics model with surface tension.

On the Determination of Elastic Moduli of Cells by AFM Based Indentation

Investigation into local cell mechanics by atomic force microscopy mapping and optical tweezer vertical indentation

Measuring biomaterials mechanics with atomic force microscopy. 1. Influence of the loading rate and applied force (pyramidal tips)

Simultaneous Measurement of Multiple Mechanical Properties of Single Cells Using AFM by Indentation and Vibration

AFM Applications for Cell Mechanics and Pathology

Automatic elasticity measurement of single cells using a microfluidic system with real-time image processing*

Effect of F-actin and Microtubules on Cellular Mechanical Behavior Studied Using Atomic Force Microscope and an Image Recognition-Based Cytoskeleton Quantification Approach

Advanced Mechanical Testing Technologies at the Cellular Level: The Mechanisms and Application in Tissue Engineering

Beyond stiffness: Multiscale viscoelastic features as biomechanical markers for assessing cell types and states

A Simulation of the Mechanical Testing of the Cell Membrane and Cytoskeleton

Supracellular Measurement of Spatially Varying Mechanical Heterogeneities in Live Monolayers

A one-step procedure to probe the viscoelastic properties of cells by Atomic Force Microscopy

Cell elasticity measurement using a microfluidic device with real-time pressure feedback.

A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties