Abstract:In randomized controlled trials, forest plots are frequently used to investigate the homogeneity of treatment effect estimates in subgroups. However, the interpretation of subgroup-specific treatment effect estimates requires great care due to the smaller sample size of subgroups and the large number of investigated subgroups. Bayesian shrinkage methods have been proposed to address these issues, but they often focus on disjoint subgroups while subgroups displayed in forest plots are overlapping, i.e., each subject appears in multiple subgroups. In our approach, we first build a flexible Cox model based on all available observations, including categorical covariates that identify the subgroups of interest and their interactions with the treatment group variable. We explore both penalized partial likelihood estimation with a lasso or ridge penalty for treatment-by-covariate interaction terms, and Bayesian estimation with a regularized horseshoe prior. One advantage of the Bayesian approach is the ability to derive credible intervals for shrunken subgroup-specific estimates. In a second step, the Cox model is marginalized to obtain treatment effect estimates for all subgroups. We illustrate these methods using data from a randomized clinical trial in follicular lymphoma and evaluate their properties in a simulation study. In all simulation scenarios, the overall mean-squared error is substantially smaller for penalized and shrinkage estimators compared to the standard subgroup-specific treatment effect estimator but leads to some bias for heterogeneous subgroups. We recommend that subgroup-specific estimators, which are typically displayed in forest plots, are more routinely complemented by treatment effect estimators based on shrinkage methods. The proposed methods are implemented in the R package bonsaiforest.

FAST: a fused and accurate shrinkage tree for heterogeneous treatment effects estimation

FAST: a Fused and Accurate Shrinkage Tree for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation

Shrinkage Bayesian Causal Forests for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation

Debiased Causal Tree: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation with Unmeasured Confounding

Difference-in-Differences Meets Tree-based Methods: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation with Unmeasured Confounding.

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Panel Data

Adaptively leverage multiple real-world data sources for treatment effect estimation based on similarity

Using shrinkage methods to estimate treatment effects in overlapping subgroups in randomized clinical trials with a time-to-event endpoint

Modelling hetegeneous treatment effects by quantitle local polynomial decision tree and forest

A Shrinkage Method for Testing the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium in Case‐Control Studies

Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests

Stable Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.

Random forests of interaction trees for estimating individualized treatment effects in randomized trials

Some methods for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in high-dimensions

A Unified Framework for Efficient Estimation of General Treatment Models

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using a Conditional Moment Based Approach

Fused Extended Two-Way Fixed Effects for Difference-in-Differences With Staggered Adoptions

A flexible approach for causal inference with multiple treatments and clustered survival outcomes

Multiply Robust Federated Estimation of Targeted Average Treatment Effects

ASSESSING THE HETEROGENEITY OF TREATMENT EFFECTS BY IDENTIFYING THE TREATMENT BENEFIT RATE AND TREATMENT HARM RATE

Efficient Balanced Treatment Assignments for Experimentation