Abstract:Purpose This study examines the existence of a causal relationship between the capital structure at the creation of the small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) and its viability after 3 years. Design/methodology/approach The empirical strategy consists of proceeding in two stages: first, the use of the Logit model to regress the studied variable reflecting the state of an SME of being in default or not, on the variables likely to significantly explain its default risk. Second, the authors investigate the existence of a relationship between the capital structure at the time of SME creation and viability. The obtained results are analyzed to confirm the initial hypothesis. Findings The results obtained indicate that the Logit model performs well in terms of discriminating and classifying SMEs. These findings are consistent with previous studies and support their conclusions regarding the model's strong classification capability. Furthermore, the model demonstrates a noteworthy classification rate of 90% for capital SMEs, specifically joint-stock companies (SpA). Out of the 10 observed SMEs, 8 nonfailing SMEs were still operational three years after the observation period, resulting in a survival rate of 80%. Practical implications The results allow bankers to better understand the main determinants of SME default risk and demonstrate the existence of a causal relationship between the capital structure of an SME and its viability. This study is conducted in the construction, public works, and hydraulics sector (second largest sector in Algeria after the services sector). In future works, the authors try to extend the results of this study to other sectors of activity. Originality/value The richness of the established Logit model is to consider both financial and non-financial and qualitative variables. Although the qualitative variables are not statistically significant in the results obtained, the authors used the "Legal form" variable to demonstrate the existence of a causal relationship between the capital structure of an SME and its viability.

Default prediction of small and medium enterprises: Portuguese construction sector

The role of financial constraint factors in predicting SME default

Capital structure and default risk of small and medium enterprises: evidence from Algeria

Prediction of Micro- and Small-Sized Enterprise Default Risk Based on a Logistic Model: Evidence from a Bank of China

Distance to default as a measure of default risk

Downturn LGD: A More Conservative Approach for Economic Decline Periods

Default Prediction for Wholesale and Retail Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using Loan Transaction and Market Evaluation Data

Using Decision Trees to Predict Insolvency in Spanish SMEs: Is Early Warning Possible?

Impacts of the Expected Credit Loss Model on Pro-Cyclicality, Earnings Management, and Equity Management in the Portuguese Banking Sector

Financing entrepreneurial activity in Uruguay: time to default in a public microcredit institution

Bottom-Up Default Analysis of Corporate Solvency Risk: An Application to Latin America

Credit risk modelling within the euro area in the COVID‐19 period: Evidence from an ICAS framework

Bankruptcy Prediction for Micro and Small Enterprises Using Financial, Non-Financial, Business Sector and Macroeconomic Variables: The Case of the Lithuanian Construction Sector

An Evidence of Link between Default and Loss of Bank Loans from the Modeling of Competing Risks

Empirical Test on Determinants of Credit Default for Small and Micro Enterprises：Evidence from a Regional Branch of One Chinese State-owned Commercial Bank

Estimation of default and pricing for invoice trading (P2B) on crowdlending platforms

Firms Default Prediction with Machine Learning

Impact of location on the probability of default in the Spanish lodging industry

Analyzing the effects of climate risk on discouraged borrowers: Deciphering the contradictory forces

Personal factors as determinants of the risk rating for SME investment

Local banking development and SME conservative financing policy. Does bank branch density matter?