Abstract:The concepts of sustainability and governance share an implicit relationship: sustainability has often been asserted to require suitable governance arrangements, which should, in turn, be sustainable. However, this semantic intersection requires more study. To contribute to this gap, this paper aims at: 1) identifying the meanings and interests that are mobilized when the two terms of sustainability and governance intersect within academic communication; and 2) observe semantic structures allowing for the sustainability-governance intersection to translate meanings between different academic communities. To pursue this aim, the study employed a computer-aided algorithm, called Latent Dirichlet Analysis, to produce and examine a topic model of 7.358 Web of Science-indexed papers published between 1992 and 2017. The analysis output 29 topics condensing key themes, concepts, and approaches in academic literature associating sustainability and governance. These were subsequently grouped into four semantic constellations of transversal meanings providing coherence to the heterogeneity of the field: a) governance of State-level sustainable development; b) governance of the sustainable use of natural resources; c) sustainable governance of integration and autonomy in a globalized world; and d) sustainable corporate governance. These results led to the conclusion that the growingly differentiated literature on sustainability and governance has tended to organize in a tightly-knit field, articulating distinct methodological and theoretical perspectives within a shared set of value commitments -the promotion of a sustainable future. Arguably, this has been made possible by the 'hybrid' character of the concept of sustainability, as much a description of the world as it is as a prescription of the world-to-be. Additionally, the study unveiled that the implicit relationship linking sustainability and governance has been running both ways, i.e. that governance may be framed as a way to achieve sustainability as much as sustainability can be depicted as a way to achieve governance.

Can democracy accelerate sustainability transformations? Policy coherence for participatory co-existence

Political drivers of policy coherence for sustainable development: An analytical framework

How scholars break down “policy coherence”: The impact of sustainable development global agendas on academic literature

The (anti-)politics of policy coherence for sustainable development in the Netherlands: Logic, method, effects

Participatory Democracy and Sustainability. Deliberative Democratic Innovation and Its Acceptance by Citizens and German Local Councilors

Agency and constraint in environmental policy coherence

Enhancing Democratic Processes through Interdisciplinary Research

Democratic discrepancies in urban sustainable development

Environmental Sustainability in Developing Countries: Does Democracy Matter?

Rethinking Sustainable Development Using Deep Ecology and Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems: Implications for Protected Areas Management

Participation in Energy Transitions: A Comparison of Policy Styles

Governing sustainability or sustainable governance? Semantic constellations on the sustainability-governance intersection in academic literature

What roles can democracy labs play in co-creating democratic innovations for sustainability?

Measuring policy coherence on global access to clean energy between European countries

From policy coherence to 21st century convergence: a whole‐of‐society paradigm of human and economic development

Strong sustainability in coastal areas: a conceptual interpretation of SDG 14

Rules to Goals: Emergence of New Governance Strategies for Sustainable Development

Quantifying the Coherence of Development Policy Priorities

Unveiling Understandings of the Rio Declaration's Sustainability Principles: A Case of Alternative Concepts, Misaligned (Dis)Connections, and Terminological Evolution

Do we have time for democracy? Climate action and the problem of time in the Anthropocene

The crucial role of complementarity, transparency and adaptability for designing energy policies for sustainable development