Abstract:Importance: Residents must prepare for effective communication with patients after medical errors. The video-based communication assessment (VCA) is software that plays video of a patient scenario, asks the physician to record what they would say, engages crowdsourced laypeople to rate audio recordings of physician responses, and presents feedback to physicians. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of VCA feedback in resident error disclosure skill training. Design, setting, and participants: This single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2022 to May 2023 at 7 US internal medicine and family medicine residencies (10 total sites). Participants were second-year residents attending required teaching conferences. Data analysis was performed from July to December 2023. Intervention: Residents completed 2 VCA cases at time 1 and were randomized to the intervention, an individual feedback report provided in the VCA application after 2 weeks, or to control, in which feedback was not provided until after time 2. Residents completed 2 additional VCA cases after 4 weeks (time 2). Main outcomes and measures: Panels of crowdsourced laypeople rated recordings of residents disclosing simulated medical errors to create scores on a 5-point scale. Reports included learning points derived from layperson comments. Mean time 2 ratings were compared to test the hypothesis that residents who had access to feedback on their time 1 performance would score higher at time 2 than those without feedback access. Residents were surveyed about demographic characteristics, disclosure experience, and feedback use. The intervention's effect was examined using analysis of covariance. Results: A total of 146 residents (87 [60.0%] aged 25-29 years; 60 female [41.0%]) completed the time 1 VCA, and 103 (70.5%) completed the time 2 VCA (53 randomized to intervention and 50 randomized to control); of those, 28 (54.9%) reported reviewing their feedback. Analysis of covariance found a significant main effect of feedback between intervention and control groups at time 2 (mean [SD] score, 3.26 [0.45] vs 3.14 [0.39]; difference, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.48; P = .01). In post hoc comparisons restricted to residents without prior disclosure experience, intervention residents scored higher than those in the control group at time 2 (mean [SD] score, 3.33 [0.43] vs 3.09 [0.44]; difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.01-0.48; P = .007). Worse performance at time 1 was associated with increased likelihood of dropping out before time 2 (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.06-7.84; P = .04). Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, self-directed review of crowdsourced feedback was associated with higher ratings of internal medicine and family medicine residents' error disclosure skill, particularly for those without real-life error disclosure experience, suggesting that such feedback may be an effective way for residency programs to address their requirement to prepare trainees for communicating with patients after medical harm. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06234085.

Disclosure following a medical error: lessons learned from a national initiative of workshops with patients, healthcare teams, and executives

Disclosure programmes in the US—an inadequate response to medical error

Individual and Team-Based Medical Error Disclosure: Dialectical Tensions Among Health Care Providers

Teaching Medical Students the Art of Medical Error Full Disclosure: Evaluation of a New Curriculum

Disclosure of Adverse Events and Medical Errors: A Framework for Anesthesiologists

Medical Error Disclosure: An Entrustable Professional Activity During an Objective Standardized Clinical Examination for Clerkship Students

Open disclosure: appropriate timing is crucial.

Medical Error: Using Storytelling and Reflection to Impact Error Response Factors in Family Medicine Residents

Disclosure of medical errors to patients by medical professionals: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review

Disclosing large scale adverse events in the US Veterans Health Administration: lessons from media responses

Medical Error: Using Storytelling and Reflection to Impact Resident Error Response Factors

Transforming medical students' speaking-up behaviors in medical errors: The impact of simulation and personalized debriefing

Benefit of Simulation-Based Training in Medical Adverse Events Disclosure in Pediatrics

Lebanese medical students' attitudes towards patient safety and medical error disclosure: A cross-sectional study

Open disclosure of adverse events: exploring the implications of service and policy structures on practice

Crowdsourced Feedback to Improve Resident Physician Error Disclosure Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial

When Bad Things Happen: Training Medical Students to Anticipate the Aftermath of Medical Errors

Effectiveness of a Patient Safety Incident Disclosure Education Program: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Error Disclosure Climate and Safety Climate Trajectories: the Mediating Role of Counterfactual Sharing

The impact of errors on healthcare professionals in the critical care setting

Examining Barriers and Motivations to Speak up on Medical Errors in a Simulated Clinical Emergency: A Mixed-Methods Study