Abstract:Introduction Although the disclosure of medical errors is an integral component of medical ethics, it remains inconsistent in practice worldwide. Despite various explanations of why healthcare professionals reveal their mistakes to patients, comprehensive comparisons and evaluations of this topic remain lacking. The objective of this review is to evaluate the experience of medical error disclosure among medical professionals who have been involved in such errors. Methods and analysis This work will focus on studies involving medical professionals from various countries who work in hospital settings and have obtained an understanding of and firsthand experience with medical error disclosure. This review will include qualitative studies. Studies published in databases such as PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, OVID, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and Cochrane Library from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2024 will be searched as part of this research. Additionally, OpenGrey will be searched manually to obtain supplementary information. The search will be conducted starting in May 2024 and will include both Chinese-language and English-language literature. The systematic review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence and use the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information online program. Study authenticity will be investigated via the Qualitative Research Authenticity Evaluation Tool provided by the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Centre, and data extraction will be performed via the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument data extraction tool. The results will be integrated via a pooled integration methodology and evaluated in terms of reliability via the ConQual qualitative systematic evaluation evidence grading tool. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for the study because the review will be based on pre-existing data available in the literature. The results of this systematic review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024494360.

Disclosure of Adverse Events and Medical Errors: A Framework for Anesthesiologists

Disclosure following a medical error: lessons learned from a national initiative of workshops with patients, healthcare teams, and executives

Medical Error Disclosure: An Entrustable Professional Activity During an Objective Standardized Clinical Examination for Clerkship Students

Open disclosure: appropriate timing is crucial.

Teaching Medical Students the Art of Medical Error Full Disclosure: Evaluation of a New Curriculum

Individual and Team-Based Medical Error Disclosure: Dialectical Tensions Among Health Care Providers

Open disclosure of adverse events: exploring the implications of service and policy structures on practice

The role of anesthesiologists’ perceived self-efficacy in anesthesia-related adverse events

Disclosure programmes in the US—an inadequate response to medical error

Disclosure of medical errors to patients by medical professionals: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review

Beyond adverse events in anesthesiology: 'unanticipated events' and strategies for improved reporting

Benefit of Simulation-Based Training in Medical Adverse Events Disclosure in Pediatrics

Disclosing large scale adverse events in the US Veterans Health Administration: lessons from media responses

The Role of Pediatric Nurses During Preventable Adverse Event Disclosure: A Scoping Review

Perspectives on Anesthesia and Perioperative Patient Safety: Past, Present, and Future

Why Talking Is Not Cheap: Adverse Events and Informal Communication

The impact of errors on healthcare professionals in the critical care setting

Ethical Approach to the Abusive/Disruptive Physician

What should I tell my patient? Disclosure in anaesthesiology: difficulties, requirements, guidelines and suggestions

Are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?

[Is training on basic skills and management of critical events responsible of ethical considerations in anaesthesia and intensive care?]