Abstract:River restoration programmes with the goal of conserving and rehabilitating inland fishes have a multi‐decadal history, but evaluation and synthesis of past restoration actions have been limited by a lack of monitoring and reporting. Given that calls for both monitoring and systematic reviews of restoration have increased, we were interested in the influence that restoration has had on improving conditions for riverine fishes resulting from long‐standing and increasingly prominent stressors. Our objectives were to (1) identify which stressors were targeted in river restoration efforts, (2) determine the proportion of published studies that articulate restoration goals and develop comparative monitoring designs for assessing the effects of restoration on fishes, and (3) conduct a meta‐analysis to synthesise fish responses to restoration projects. We assessed restoration effectiveness for increasing fish density and richness from peer‐reviewed papers published over the past decade using a global systematic review and meta‐analysis. We found that restoration actions addressed major stressors primarily by improving in‐stream habitat (37%), increasing in‐stream longitudinal connectivity (26%) and increasing lateral floodplain connections (9%). Although 81% of studies had comparative monitoring designs (i.e., before/after and control/impact) and stated restoration goals, only 40% of those studies reported sufficient data to be included in the meta‐analysis. Projects which increased in‐stream connectivity had the largest positive effect size on fish density and richness compared to in‐stream habitat improvements and increasing floodplain connections. Time since restoration and restoration size (i.e., geographical footprint) were not strong predictors of fish response effect sizes. Restoration effectiveness was highly variable among project types. Authors of studies included in the meta‐analysis often identified spatial or temporal scale of monitoring, overriding catchment conditions, and recolonisation potential as sources of variability and effectiveness in restoration outcomes. Systematic reporting of these and other covariates may help guide processes in restoration evaluation and provide valuable research insights. Despite increased emphasis on monitoring, incomplete data reporting limited the number of studies that could be included for quantitative meta‐analysis. Persistent emphasis on setting specific criteria (e.g., measurable outcomes of fish response) for restoration goals, project monitoring, data reporting, information sharing and collaborative projects is likely to continue to improve understanding of restoration effectiveness transferable to future endeavours. Our results can be used to support river restoration practitioners with evidence‐based information to evaluate the cost–benefit ratio of competing restoration priorities, and inform restoration planning and implementation for riverine fish.

Fish and crustaceans provide early indicators of success in wetland restoration

Ecological indicators for restoration success: Development of fish diversity in a large restored floodplain over twelve years

Restoration promotes ecological functioning through greater complementarity

Revisiting restored river reaches - Assessing change of aquatic and riparian communities after five years

How restoration engineering measures can enhance the ecological value of intertidal flats

Long and lasting: spatial patterns and temporal trends in a fish community responding to landscape-scale hydrological restoration of a coastal freshwater wetland complex

Measuring fisheries outcomes from coastal wetland restoration: a review and meta‐analysis

Evaluating restoration success using metric‐based indicators of ecosystem recovery in tidal marshes along the northern Gulf of Mexico

Biogeomorphological response to river restoration of a suburban river with large wood: Creating a restoration vision and cost‐effectively monitoring the response trajectory using the citizen science MoRPh survey

Benthic Community Metrics Track Hydrologically Stressed Mangrove Systems

A multi‐metric index for assessing two decades of community responses to broad‐scale shoreline enhancement and restoration along the Toronto waterfront

Estimating enhanced fish production on restored shellfish reefs using automated data collection from underwater videos

How tolerances, competition and dispersal shape benthic invertebrate colonisation in restored urban streams

Wetland geomorphology and tidal hydrodynamics drive fine-scale fish community composition and abundance

Evaluating effectiveness of restoration to address current stressors to riverine fish

Benthic macroinvertebrate response to estuarine emergent marsh restoration across a delta-wide environmental gradient

Nearshore fish community changes along the Toronto waterfront in accordance with management and restoration goals: Insights from two decades of monitoring

Near‐term impacts of coral restoration on target species, coral reef community structure, and ecological processes

Identifying restoration hotspots that deliver multiple ecological benefits

Continuous riverine biodiversity changes in a 10‐years‐post‐restoration‐study—Impacts and pitfalls

Hydrodynamic and biogeochemical evolution of a restored intertidal oyster (Crassostrea virginica) reef