Abstract:River restoration programmes with the goal of conserving and rehabilitating inland fishes have a multi‐decadal history, but evaluation and synthesis of past restoration actions have been limited by a lack of monitoring and reporting. Given that calls for both monitoring and systematic reviews of restoration have increased, we were interested in the influence that restoration has had on improving conditions for riverine fishes resulting from long‐standing and increasingly prominent stressors. Our objectives were to (1) identify which stressors were targeted in river restoration efforts, (2) determine the proportion of published studies that articulate restoration goals and develop comparative monitoring designs for assessing the effects of restoration on fishes, and (3) conduct a meta‐analysis to synthesise fish responses to restoration projects. We assessed restoration effectiveness for increasing fish density and richness from peer‐reviewed papers published over the past decade using a global systematic review and meta‐analysis. We found that restoration actions addressed major stressors primarily by improving in‐stream habitat (37%), increasing in‐stream longitudinal connectivity (26%) and increasing lateral floodplain connections (9%). Although 81% of studies had comparative monitoring designs (i.e., before/after and control/impact) and stated restoration goals, only 40% of those studies reported sufficient data to be included in the meta‐analysis. Projects which increased in‐stream connectivity had the largest positive effect size on fish density and richness compared to in‐stream habitat improvements and increasing floodplain connections. Time since restoration and restoration size (i.e., geographical footprint) were not strong predictors of fish response effect sizes. Restoration effectiveness was highly variable among project types. Authors of studies included in the meta‐analysis often identified spatial or temporal scale of monitoring, overriding catchment conditions, and recolonisation potential as sources of variability and effectiveness in restoration outcomes. Systematic reporting of these and other covariates may help guide processes in restoration evaluation and provide valuable research insights. Despite increased emphasis on monitoring, incomplete data reporting limited the number of studies that could be included for quantitative meta‐analysis. Persistent emphasis on setting specific criteria (e.g., measurable outcomes of fish response) for restoration goals, project monitoring, data reporting, information sharing and collaborative projects is likely to continue to improve understanding of restoration effectiveness transferable to future endeavours. Our results can be used to support river restoration practitioners with evidence‐based information to evaluate the cost–benefit ratio of competing restoration priorities, and inform restoration planning and implementation for riverine fish.

Revisiting restored river reaches - Assessing change of aquatic and riparian communities after five years

Continuous riverine biodiversity changes in a 10‐years‐post‐restoration‐study—Impacts and pitfalls

Primarily neutral effects of river restoration on macroinvertebrates, macrophytes, and fishes after a decade of monitoring

Ecological indicators for restoration success: Development of fish diversity in a large restored floodplain over twelve years

Long-term recovery of benthic food webs after stream restoration

How tolerances, competition and dispersal shape benthic invertebrate colonisation in restored urban streams

Evaluating effectiveness of restoration to address current stressors to riverine fish

Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2

Effects of large-river restoration measures on ecological fish guilds and focal species of conservation in a large European river (Danube, Austria)

30 years of large river restoration: How long do restored floodplain channels remain suitable for targeted rheophilic fishes in the lower river Rhine?

Does river restoration work? Taxonomic and functional trajectories at two restoration schemes

A meta-analysis of environmental responses to freshwater ecosystem restoration in China (1987-2018).

The Effects of Legacy Sediment Removal and Floodplain Reconnection on Riparian Plant Communities

Stream macroinvertebrate communities in restored and impacted catchments respond differently to climate, land-use, and runoff over a decade

Biogeomorphological response to river restoration of a suburban river with large wood: Creating a restoration vision and cost‐effectively monitoring the response trajectory using the citizen science MoRPh survey

Riparian wetland rehabilitation and beaver re-colonization impacts on hydrological processes and water quality in a lowland agricultural catchment

Assessing the Context and Ecological Effects of River Restoration – A Meta-Analysis

Effects of Instream Restoration Measures on the Physical Habitats and Benthic Macroinvertebrates in an Agricultural Headwater Stream

Over forty years of lowland stream restoration: Lessons learned?

Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 1

Contributions of source populations, habitat suitability and trait overlap to benthic invertebrate community assembly in restored urban streams