Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S416142

IF: 2.8319

2023-06-14

Journal of Pain Research

Abstract:Kang Yu, &ast Zhigang Ding, &ast Jiaojiao Yang, Xue Han, Tianzuo Li, Huihui Miao Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Huihui Miao, Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10th Tieyi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, People's Republic of China, Email Background: Maternal pain during labor is one of the most important factors contributing to increased cesarean delivery rates and poor pregnancy outcomes, and this pain can be managed by labor analgesia. Many studies exist on labor analgesia, and the quantity and quality of these studies have not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of studies from 2002 to 2021. Methods: We used the Web of Science database to obtain publications related to labor analgesia from January 2002 to December 2021. Various bibliographic information was collected, including country; author; journal; grant; discipline; institution and research hotspot. A total of 4536 papers were included. Results: A total of 4536 articles were included in the study. The country with the most published articles on labor analgesia and the country of the funding agency was the United States. Most articles were published in the disciplines Anesthesiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology. The journal that published the most articles in this category was International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. In addition, we found different research hotspots for labor analgesia in the United States, Japan, and China. Conclusion: This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of research on labor analgesia and highlights the differences in research hotspots for labor analgesia between countries. Keywords: labor analgesia, bibliometric analysis, hotspots Women in labor suffer prolonged bouts of severe pain during delivery, leading to an increased risk of complications such as postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum depression. 1 Labor analgesia, both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic, can promote, support, and protect natural labor and improve the labor experience. 2 Different modes of labor analgesia may also alter the outcome of labor, maternal expectations and preferences for analgesia should be fully respected and supported, and the decision-making model for labor analgesia is often dominated by a healthcare-led paternalistic or informed consent model. 2 For a long time, labor analgesia has been performed by a single epidural injection of a large dose of local anesthesia, which produces analgesia and a short operative time after injection. 3 Since then, researchers have diverged in their views on labor analgesia techniques and the emergence of epidural catheters, which solved the problem of repeated epidural puncture operations and reduced maternal postoperative complications. The concept of drugs for epidural blocks has also often changed, and the addition of opioids to the drugs can reduce the concentration of bupivacaine to 0.065%, which can improve the adverse effects on the maternal lower limbs after delivery. In recent years, new levorotatory isomers of local anesthetics, levoropivacaine and levobupivacaine, have been introduced, which may be less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine. 4 Remifentanil is a potent, ultra-short-acting opioid with a rapid onset of action and a rapid drug elimination half-life, able to be metabolized 3–5 minutes after discontinuation of the drug. 5 Remifentanil has been shown to cause fewer maternal and neonatal postoperative complications than other opioid analgesics. 6 Remifentanil can cross the placenta, but some countries believe that it can still be used in obstetric anesthesia because it can be rapidly metabolized in the fetus. With social concerns, labor analgesia should be taken seriously, and labor pains have been developed in various countries and research findings have been reported. However, few of these articles are currently reported for statistical analysis and generalization of research trends. Bibliometric analysis refers to the quantitative and qualitative analysis of literature using theories and methods of metrology and informatics, and reflects the quantity, quality and influence of literature more systematically by quantifying and analyzing the time of publication, authors, citations, institutions and other factors. A previous bibliometric analysis by Zheng et al analyzed the bibliometric analysis on labor analgesia over the last 30 years, 7 and the innovation of our study was to analyze the hotspots of research in three countries -Abstract Truncated-

clinical neurology