Bibliometric Analysis of Research Studies on Postoperative Pain Management of Cesarean Section
Wenwen Zhai,Huili Liu,Zhuoying Yu,Ye Jiang,Jing Yang,Min Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S404659
IF: 2.8319
2023-04-22
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Wenwen Zhai, &ast Huili Liu, &ast Zhuoying Yu, Ye Jiang, Jing Yang, Min Li Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Min Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 13522757239, Email Purpose: Cesarean section (C-section) is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Many studies on pain management after C-section have been published in recent decades, many of which focused on new regional techniques. The purpose of this study is to outline the connections within the dynamic evolution of postcesarean delivery analgesia research publications using retrospective bibliometric analysis. Patients and Methods: Published studies on postoperative pain management of C-section were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) of Web of Science (WOS) Core collection database. All papers published from 1978 to October 22, 2022 were searched. The research progress and growing trend were quantitatively analyzed by total publications, research institutions, journal impact factors, and author's contribution. Total citations frequency, average citations per item and h-index were used for evaluating literature quantity. Top 20 journals with the highest number of publications were charted. The keywords co-occurrence overlay map was visualized by the VOSviewer software. Results: From 1978 to 2022, a total of 1032 articles in postcesarean delivery analgesia research field were published, with 23,813 times cited, average citations of 23.07 per item, and an h-index of 68. The most high-yield publication year, countries, journals, authors, institutions were 2020 (n=79), the United States (n=288), Anesthesia and Analgesia (n=108), Carvalho B (n=25), and Stanford University (n=33), respectively. The United States had the most cited papers. The future research interest might be "prescription", "quadratus lumborum block", "postnatal depression", "persistent pain", "dexmedetomidine", "enhanced recovery", and "multimodal analgesia". Conclusion: By employing the online bibliometric tool and VOSviewer software, we found that studies on postcesarean analgesia had grown markedly. The focus had evolved to nerve block, postnatal depression, persistent pain, and enhanced recovery. Keywords: postcesarean section, analgesia, bibliometric analysis, keywords analysis The rate of Cesarean section (C-section) has been increasing over the past decades and now exceeds 32% of births. 1 C-section can cause moderate-to-severe postoperative pain in a large percentage of women. 2 Poor management of acute postoperative pain can be associated with chronic postoperative pain, 3 increased opioids use, delayed functional recovery, and an increase in postpartum depression. 4,5 On the contrary, well-controlled postcesarean pain may improve a woman's ability to function and mother‐child bonding. 6 Previously, commonly used modalities included systemic administration of opioids, such as intramuscular injection, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), and neuraxial injection during regional anesthesia. 6 Recent studies have focused on an opioid-saving and multimodal analgesic strategy. 7,8 A number of new regional anesthesia techniques, such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block 7 and the quadratus lumborum block, 8 along with the non‐pharmacological approaches, 9 have been developed. Therefore, we sought to examine the status of the research on pain interventions for C-section and to identify the popular areas and the frontiers of research on pain management after C-section. Since bibliometric analysis is a scientific method for summarizing and synthesizing literature, we aim to perform a bibliometric analysis of the reports on postcesarean delivery analgesia to find out the achievements and the development directions in this field. The literature data were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) of Web of Science (WOS) Core collection database, which was widely applied in bibliometric research using an advanced search strategy. The search query was "TS = ("cesarean section" OR "cesarean delivery" OR "cesarean" OR "C-section" OR "caesarean" OR "caesarean section" OR "caesarean delivery") AND TS = ("postoperative" OR "postoperative periods" OR "postcesarean" OR "post cesarean" OR "postcesarean" OR "after cesarean" OR "post caesarean" OR "post-caesarean" OR "postcaesarean" OR "after caesarean") AND TS = ("pain" OR "pain management" OR "analges -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology