Abstract:Background: Previous studies reported good outcomes of acetabular cup placement using portable navigation systems during THA. However, we are aware of no prospective studies comparing inexpensive portable navigation systems using augmented reality (AR) technology with accelerometer-based portable navigation systems in THA. Questions/purposes: (1) Is the placement accuracy of the acetabular cup using the AR-based portable navigation system superior to that of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system? (2) Do the frequencies of surgical complications differ between the two groups? Methods: We conducted a prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving patients scheduled for unilateral THA. Between August and December 2021, we treated 148 patients who had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, idiopathic osteonecrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or femoral neck fracture and were scheduled to undergo unilateral primary THA. Of these patients, 100% (148) were eligible, 90% (133) were approached for inclusion in the study, and 85% (126) were finally randomized into either the AR group (62 patients) or the accelerometer group (64 patients). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed, and there was no crossover between groups and no dropouts; all patients in both groups were included in the analysis. There were no differences in any key covariates, including age, sex, and BMI, between the two groups. All THAs were performed via the modified Watson-Jones approach with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The primary outcome was the absolute difference between the cup placement angle displayed on the screen of the navigation system and that measured on postoperative radiographs. The secondary outcome was intraoperative or postoperative complications recorded during the study period for the two portable navigation systems. Results: There were no differences between the AR and accelerometer groups in terms of the mean absolute difference in radiographic inclination angle (3° ± 2° versus 3° ± 2° [95% CI -1.2° to 0.3°]; p = 0.22). The mean absolute difference in radiographic anteversion angle displayed on the navigation screen during surgery compared with that measured on postoperative radiographs was smaller in the AR group than that in the accelerometer group (2° ± 2° versus 5° ± 4° [95% CI -4.2° to -2.0°]; p < 0.001). There were few complications in either group. In the AR group, there was one patient each with a surgical site infection, intraoperative fracture, distal deep vein thrombosis, and intraoperative pin loosening; in the accelerometer group, there was one patient each with an intraoperative fracture and intraoperative loosening of pins. Conclusion: Although the AR-based portable navigation system demonstrated slight improvements in radiographic anteversion of cup placement compared with the accelerometer-based portable navigation system in THA, whether those small differences will prove clinically important is unknown. Until or unless future studies demonstrate clinical advantages that patients can perceive that are associated with such small radiographic differences, because of the costs and the unquantified risks associated with novel devices, we recommend against the widespread use of these systems in clinical practice. Level of evidence: Level I, therapeutic study.

The accuracy of a portable accelerometer-based navigation system for tibial alignment can be reliable during total knee arthroplasty for obese patients

Accuracy and outcome of a handheld accelerometer-based navigation device compared to conventional alignment method in total knee arthroplasty in a Chinese population

Cadaveric analysis of an accelerometer-based portable navigation device for distal femoral cutting block alignment in total knee arthroplasty

[Comparison of Alignment and Position of Prosthesis Between Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation Device and Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Valgus Deformity].

The accelerometer-based navigation system demonstrated superior radiological outcomes in restoring mechanical alignment and component sagittal positioning in total knee arthroplasty

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement using CT-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty: Comparison between obese and non-obese patients

Total knee replacement with an accelerometer-based, hand-held navigation system improves knee alignment: reliable in all patients

Effect of body mass index on postoperative mechanical alignment and long-term outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study of 671 knees

Comparison of accuracy of cup position using portable navigation versus alignment guide in total hip arthroplasty in supine position

[Comparison of Alignment and Operative Time Between Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation Device and Computer Assisted Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty].

Increased accuracy in component positioning using an image-less robotic arm system in primary total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity in total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment does not increase knee adduction moments

CT Validation of Intraoperative Implant Position and Knee Alignment as Determined by the MAKO Total Knee Arthroplasty System

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique

Influence of lower limb rotation in navigated alignment analysis: implications for high tibial osteotomies

Comparison of a Novel Handheld Accelerometer-Based Navigation System and Conventional Instrument for Performing Distal Femoral Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The iAssist Navigation System Demonstrated Superior Radiological Outcomes in Restoring Mechanical Alignment and Component Sagittal Positioning in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Does Augmented Reality-based Portable Navigation Improve the Accuracy of Cup Placement in THA Compared With Accelerometer-based Portable Navigation? A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Traditional Intramedullary Axis Underestimates the Medial Tibial Slope Compared to Transmalleolar Sagittal Axis in Image-based Robotic-Assisted Unicompartimental Knee Arthroplasty

[Effect of the Surgical Time and Coronalmechanical Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer Navigation System, Traditionalor 3D Printing Patient-Specific Instruments].