Abstract:The author of the article examines the provisions of the current criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine, the decision of the European Court of Human Rights and the modern practice of the courts of Ukraine regarding the application of the concept of “fruits of a poisoned tree” and exceptions to it. It has been proven that establishing the commission of a relevant criminal offense by a certain person or, conversely, his non-involvement in its commission is carried out on the basis of evidence provided to the court by the participants in the adversarial procedure. Determining the admissibility of the evidence presented to the court is a guarantee of the balance of rights of all participants in the criminal proceedings and ensuring that the court adopts a legal and fair decision on the case. In this context, the implementation of the concepts formulated in the criminal trials of foreign countries, regarding issues of admissibility of evidence, to the current criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine becomes important and requires additional research. The purpose of the article is to study the essence of concepts that are an exception to the rule of “fruits of the poisoned tree”, to implement their application in the judicial practice of Ukraine, in order to obtain new scientific knowledge and ensure correct understanding. In the world practice and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, in particular, certain concepts were formed when solving the issue of admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings, which are implemented at the present time and in the judicial practice of Ukraine. The most widespread and well-known of them in matters of inadmissibility of evidence is the concept of “fruit of the poisoned tree”, the essence of which is that if the source of evidence is improper, then all the evidence obtained with its help will be the same. However, at the present time there are already a certain number of concepts that are an exception to it and offer a different approach to the issue of recognizing evidence as admissible. It is noted that all exceptions from the concept of “fruits of the poisoned tree” have common features, in particular: first, the focus of the research is not on the violation as such, but on its essence; secondly, on establishing the impact of certain violations on ensuring a fair trial; thirdly, the credibility of the relevant evidence and the ability of the court to reach certain conclusions regarding the establishment of a person’s guilt in committing the relevant criminal offense. That is, they provide opportunities to move away from formalism in matters related to: admissibility of evidence, ensuring a fair trial and achieving the goal of criminal proceedings. It was concluded that the application, when the issue of admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings is resolved, along with the concept of “fruit of the poisoned tree” of other concepts, which are actually an exception to the stated one, gives flexibility to the criminal process in the matter of recognizing evidence as admissible, which ensures the fairness of the judicial process for both sides and a certain balance between the public interests of society and the person who is brought to criminal responsibility, his rights and freedoms. The justice of the process as a whole and the decision (sentence) of the court, as a document that is accepted according to its consequences, can be achieved by transparency and comprehensibility of the applied norms and procedures for the participants in the process and society.

Admission of Guilt and Its Consequences in Romanian Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law. The Admission of Guilt Agreement and the Abbreviated Research on the Procedure of Admission of Guilt

The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining

Guilt as One of the Grounds for the Prohibition (Suspension) Activities on the Russian Civil Law

The Romanian forensic pscychiatry system related to the admission of patients- aspects of the criminal law

Plea-Bargaining Law: the Impact of Innocence, Trial Penalty, and Conviction Probability on Plea Outcomes

The Scope of the Notions of Marriage, Property Relations and Matrimonial Agreement in Romanian Private International Law (English version)

SEPARATE ASPECTS OF THE ETHICAL AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF LEGAL AID IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BASED ON A PLEA AGREEMENT

Criminal Liability of Minors in Comparative Law: Special References to Japan and China. Implications

Conviction by Consent? Vulnerability, Autonomy and Conviction by Guilty Plea

Negotiated Agreements as an Alternative to Criminal Trials: Policy Lessons from the Hungarian Example

Admitting (to) the past: transitional justice in the European and Inter-American courts of human rights

Judicial control of criminal prosecution in the second degree of jurisdiction – controversies and regulatory opportunities

Practice and Inspiration of Plea Bargaining in German

The presumption of innocence in the system of legal presumptions

CONCEPTS OF ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS OF UKRAINE

On the Mechanism of Disposing the Case Where the Defendant Pleads Guilty

MORAL-ETHICAL AND PRAGMATIC COMPONENTS OF THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE RIGHT TO COMPROMISE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS OF UKRAINE

(Un-)rape and involuntary manslaughter as examples of aberration of legal information in criminal law in Ukraine

A Study of "Judge-Defendant Bargain" in Criminal Proceedings

The Proposed Plea Bargaining in Ethiopia: How it Fares with Fundamental Principles of Criminal law and Procedure

Presumption of innocence in international criminal proceedings: international and European practice