Abstract:We read with pleasure the comment by Lee et al. [1] in response to our article titled 'Bioengineered dermal matrix (Integra®) reduces donor site morbidity in total phallic construction with radial artery forearm free-flap' [2]. We share with the authors' the enthusiasm towards the progressive improvement of donor site reconstruction techniques after radial forearm free flap (RAFFF) harvesting and we totally agree in highlighting the need to further researches in this field to improve the donor site-related outcomes. As a matter of fact, the goal would be to minimize donor site morbidity to allow a full functional recovery of the forearm while ensuring an adequate amount of tissue to address total phallic construction (TPC). In the specific context of TPC in transgender men a secondary endpoint would be to minimize the peculiar stigma represented by donor site scar. We totally understand the relevant considerations made by Lee et al. [1] regarding our article. Indeed, although the surgical evaluation of donor site reconstruction was lacking an objective assessment tool, functional outcomes were assessed throughout the use of validated tools such as the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.0 (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Skin Pinch Test [3, 4]. It must be said that, to date, the objective assessment of the quality of a scar still represents a challenge due to the lack of a unique and shared methodology [5]. On this regard, ongoing researches are exploring the use of devices that may help to get a standardized evaluation of donor site morbidity. When available, it will be of primary importance to apply them in the context of multicentric prospective studies to finally understand which type of graft may guarantee better outcomes of donor site reconstruction after RAFFF harvesting. Among the existing devices, the Minolta Chromameter CR-300 (Minolta, Japan) was found to be the most reliable for skin color evaluation whilst the Primos (Canfield Industries, USA) demonstrated excellent intra and interobserver reliability for skin texture evaluation [5]. However, none of the devices stood out for evaluating skin elasticity. The authors concluded that unfortunately none of the devices can be designated as adequate for complete skin evaluation since content and criteria validity, responsiveness, and interpretability were missing. Regarding the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM), it offers several benefits. ADM is a dermal allograft free of immunogenic components. It can augment or replace damaged dermis, closely resembling normal skin. Its composition includes collagen, elastin (for tensile strength and elasticity), proteoglycans(inducing angiogenesis), laminin (binding with connective tissues), and basement membrane (composed of collagen type IV) [6]. Specifically, Integra® (Integra® Life Sciences, USA) is an ADM composed of a matrix of purified collagen from bovine tendon crosslinked with glycosaminoglycan (GAG) obtained from shark cartilage [7]. Besides providing a scaffold for functional dermal reconstruction, it is worth emphasizing that ADM can lead to remodeling of cutaneous tissue without causing contraction or scarring. Scar tissue is distinguishable from normal skin by its color, texture, thickness, and firmness. This can result in both cosmetic and functional consequences.

Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template: From Design to Clinical Use

The Use of Integra on Avascular Tissue

Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template in Complex Scalp Reconstruction

A Composite Application Technique of Single-stage Dermal Templates to Improve Handling and Ease of Use

Improved Dermal Regeneration Using a Combination of Dermal Substitutes and Dermal Fibroblast Optimization: A Hypothesis.

The Progress and Challenges for Dermal Regeneration in Tissue Engineering.

Polyurethane Membrane/Knitted Mesh-Reinforced Collagen-Chitosan Bilayer Dermal Substitute for the Repair of Full-Thickness Skin Defects Via A Two-Step Procedure

Comparative Analysis of Animal-Derived vs Fully Synthetic Acellular Dermal Matrices in Reconstructive Surgery

Three Types of Dermal Grafts in Rats: the Importance of Mechanical Property and Structural Design.

[Tissue Engineered Skin and Regenerative Wound Repair].

A clinical trial of Integra Template for diabetic foot ulcer treatment

Objective Non-Invasive Bio-Parametric Evaluation of Regenerated Skin: A Comparison of Two Acellular Dermal Substitutes

Use of Integra dermal regeneration template in burn patients: An Italian expert consensus Delphi study

Response to comment on: bioengineered dermal matrix (Integra®) reduces donor site morbidity in total phallic construction with radial artery forearm free-flap

Surface biology of collagen scaffold explains blocking of wound contraction and regeneration of skin and peripheral nerves

Use of a collagen/elastin-membrane for the tissue engineering of dermis

Transplanted acellular allograft dermal matrix. Potential as a template for the reconstruction of viable dermis

Pro-Regenerative Hydrogel Restores Scarless Skin during Cutaneous Wound Healing

Can a Single-Stage Approach Using a Dermal Regeneration Template Lead to Satisfactory Scalp Defect Reconstruction After Skin Cancer Excision?

[Retrospective Evaluation of the Use of a Dermal Substitute in Septorhinoplasty]

Dermatome setting for autografts to cover INTEGRA