Abstract:We read with pleasure the comment by Lee et al. [1] in response to our article titled 'Bioengineered dermal matrix (Integra®) reduces donor site morbidity in total phallic construction with radial artery forearm free-flap' [2]. We share with the authors' the enthusiasm towards the progressive improvement of donor site reconstruction techniques after radial forearm free flap (RAFFF) harvesting and we totally agree in highlighting the need to further researches in this field to improve the donor site-related outcomes. As a matter of fact, the goal would be to minimize donor site morbidity to allow a full functional recovery of the forearm while ensuring an adequate amount of tissue to address total phallic construction (TPC). In the specific context of TPC in transgender men a secondary endpoint would be to minimize the peculiar stigma represented by donor site scar. We totally understand the relevant considerations made by Lee et al. [1] regarding our article. Indeed, although the surgical evaluation of donor site reconstruction was lacking an objective assessment tool, functional outcomes were assessed throughout the use of validated tools such as the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.0 (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Skin Pinch Test [3, 4]. It must be said that, to date, the objective assessment of the quality of a scar still represents a challenge due to the lack of a unique and shared methodology [5]. On this regard, ongoing researches are exploring the use of devices that may help to get a standardized evaluation of donor site morbidity. When available, it will be of primary importance to apply them in the context of multicentric prospective studies to finally understand which type of graft may guarantee better outcomes of donor site reconstruction after RAFFF harvesting. Among the existing devices, the Minolta Chromameter CR-300 (Minolta, Japan) was found to be the most reliable for skin color evaluation whilst the Primos (Canfield Industries, USA) demonstrated excellent intra and interobserver reliability for skin texture evaluation [5]. However, none of the devices stood out for evaluating skin elasticity. The authors concluded that unfortunately none of the devices can be designated as adequate for complete skin evaluation since content and criteria validity, responsiveness, and interpretability were missing. Regarding the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM), it offers several benefits. ADM is a dermal allograft free of immunogenic components. It can augment or replace damaged dermis, closely resembling normal skin. Its composition includes collagen, elastin (for tensile strength and elasticity), proteoglycans(inducing angiogenesis), laminin (binding with connective tissues), and basement membrane (composed of collagen type IV) [6]. Specifically, Integra® (Integra® Life Sciences, USA) is an ADM composed of a matrix of purified collagen from bovine tendon crosslinked with glycosaminoglycan (GAG) obtained from shark cartilage [7]. Besides providing a scaffold for functional dermal reconstruction, it is worth emphasizing that ADM can lead to remodeling of cutaneous tissue without causing contraction or scarring. Scar tissue is distinguishable from normal skin by its color, texture, thickness, and firmness. This can result in both cosmetic and functional consequences.

Response to comment on: bioengineered dermal matrix (Integra®) reduces donor site morbidity in total phallic construction with radial artery forearm free-flap

Preclinical Optimization of a Shelf-Ready, Injectable, Human-Derived, Decellularized Allograft Adipose Matrix.

Clinical efficacy of acellular dermal matrix for plastic periodontal and implant surgery: a systematic review

Analysis of the Radial Forearm Phalloplasty Donor Site: Do Dermal Matrices Improve Donor Site Morbidity?

Objective Non-Invasive Bio-Parametric Evaluation of Regenerated Skin: A Comparison of Two Acellular Dermal Substitutes

MatriDerm Decreases Donor Site Morbidity After Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest in Transgender Surgery

Attenuating Chronic Fibrosis: Decreasing Foreign Body Response with Acellular Dermal Matrix

Performance of Human and Porcine Derived Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Long-term Clinicaland Histologic Evaluation

The use of human acellular dermal matrices in advanced wound healing and surgical procedures: State of the art

Adipose derived stem cells and platelet rich plasma improve the tissue integration and angiogenesis of biodegradable scaffolds for soft tissue regeneration

Acellular Dermal Matrix–Assisted, Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction

Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted, Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of SurgiMend PRS, AlloDerm, and DermACELL

Efficacy of split-thickness skin graft combined with novel sheet-type reprocessed micronized acellular dermal matrix

Clinical applications of acellular dermal matrices: A review

A Systematic Review of Technique, Satisfaction, and Complications of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Rhinoplasty

Development of the Acellular Dermal Matrix and Experimental Substantiation of Its Use in the Anterior Abdominal Wall hernia Repair

Human Acellular Collagen Matrices-Clinical Opportunities in Tissue Replacement

Systematic Review: Allogenic Use of Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) and Decellularized Extracellular Matrices (ECM) as Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) in Tissue Regeneration

A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial

Histologic case series of human acellular dermal matrix in superior capsule reconstruction

Utility of a New Artificial Dermis as a Successful Tool in Face and Scalp Reconstruction for Skin Cancer: Analysis of the Efficacy, Safety, and Aesthetic Outcomes