Abstract:Purpose Using the constructal law of physics this study aims to provide guidance to future scholarship on global supply chain management. Further, through two case studies the authors are developing, the authors report interview findings with two senior VPs from two multi-national corporations being disrupted by COVID-19. This study suggests how this and recent events will impact on the design of future global supply chains. Design/methodology/approach The authors apply the constructal law to explain the recent disruptions to the global supply chain orthodoxy. Two interviews are presented from case studies the authors are developing in the USA and UK – one a multi-national automobile parts supplier and the other is a earth-moving equipment manufacture. Specifically, this is an exploratory pathway work trying to make sense of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on supply chain scholarship. Findings Adopting the approach of Bejan, the authors believe that what is happening today with COVID-19 and other trade disruptions such as Brexit and the USA imposing tariffs is creating new obstacles that will redirect the future flow of supply chains. Research limitations/implications It is clear that the COVID-19 response introduced a bullwhip effect in the manufacturing sector on a scale never-before seen. For scholars, the authors would suggest there are four pathway topics going forward. These topics include: the future state of global sourcing, the unique nature of a combined “demand” and “supply shortage” bullwhip effect, the resurrection of lean and local production systems and the development of risk-recovery contingency strategies to deal with pandemics. Practical implications Supply chain managers tend to be iterative and focused on making small and subtle changes to their current system and way of thinking, very often seeking to optimize cost or negotiate better contracts with suppliers. In the current environment, however, such activities have proved to be of little consequence compared to the massive forces of economic disruption of the past three years. Organizations that have more tightly compressed supply chains are enjoying a significant benefit during the COVID-19 crisis and are no longer being held hostage to governments of another country. Social implications An implicit assumption in the press is that COVID-19 caught everyone by surprise, and that executives foolishly ignored the risks of outsourcing to China and are now paying the price. However, noted scholars and epidemiologists have been warning of the threats of pandemics since the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus. The pundits would further posit that in their pursuit of low-cost production, global corporations made naive assumptions that nothing could disrupt them. Both the firms the authors have interviewed had to close plants to protect their workforce. It was indicated in the cases the authors are developing that it is going to take manufacturers on average one month to recover from 4–6 days of disruption. These companies employ many thousands of people, and direct and ancillary workers are now temporarily laid off and face an uncertain future as/when they will recover back to normal production. Originality/value Using the constructal law of physics, the authors seek to provide guidance to future scholarship on global supply chain management. Further, through two case studies, the authors provide the first insight from two senior VPs from two leading multi-national corporations in their respective sectors being disrupted by COVID-19. This study is the first indication to how this and recent disruptive events will impact on the design of future global supply chains. Unlike the generic work, which has recently appeared in HBR and Forbes, it is grounded in real operational insight.

The Economics of Supply Chain Politics: Dual Circulation, Derisking and the Sullivan Doctrine

The End of Globalized Production? Supply-Chain Resilience, Technological Sovereignty, and Enduring Global Interdependencies in the Post-Pandemic Era

Can de-risking avert supply chain precarity in the face of China-U.S. geopolitical tensions? From sanctions to semiconductor resilience and national security

The geopolitics of supply chains: EU efforts to ensure security of supply

Corona virus, tariffs, trade wars and supply chain evolutionary design

Integrating the Dual Logic of Domestic Politics and Geopolitics:the Biden Administration’s National Supply Chains Security Strategy in the Context of Sino-U.S. Strategic Competition Chinese Full Text

Global Supply Chain Threats from Geopolitical Tension and Environmental Uncertainty: The 2024 Red Sea and Panama Canal Crises

Caught in the Deglobalisation Crosswind? De-risking by “china+1” or “In-China-for-china”

Global Supply Chains: The Looming “Great Reallocation”

The political economy and dynamics of bifurcated world governance and the decoupling of value chains: An alternative perspective

Semiconductor production, geopolitics and the CHIP SACT of 2022: a theoretical analysis

The Geography of Health: Onshoring Pharmaceutical Manufacturing to Address Supply Chain Challenges

The economic costs of supply chain decoupling

Supply Chain Decoupling: Geopolitical Debates and Economic Dynamism in East Asia

Global Supply Chain Restructuring During the Covid-19 Pandemic

A Geography of Logistics: Market Authority and the Security of Supply Chains

The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities

Intermodalism, supply chains and U.S. security

The Current Chinese Global Supply Chain Monopoly and the Covid-19 Pandemic

Impact of Geopolitical Risk on the Maritime Supply Chain: A Regional Analysis of the Effects on Global Trade

Study of Supply Chain Selection Strategies of Firms under Geopolitics