Abstract:In causal mediation analyses, of interest are the direct or indirect pathways from exposure to an outcome variable. For observation studies, massive baseline characteristics are collected as potential confounders to mitigate selection bias, possibly approaching or exceeding the sample size. Accordingly, flexible machine learning approaches are promising in filtering a subset of relevant confounders, along with estimation using the efficient influence function to avoid overfitting. Among various confounding selection strategies, two attract growing attention. One is the popular debiased, or double machine learning (DML), and another is the penalized partial correlation via fitting a Gaussian graphical network model between the confounders and the response variable. Nonetheless, for causal mediation analyses when encountering high-dimensional confounders, there is a gap in determining the best strategy for confounding selection. Therefore, we exemplify a motivating study on the human microbiome, where the dimensions of mediator and confounders approach or exceed the sample size to compare possible combinations of confounding selection methods. By deriving the multiply robust causal direct and indirect effects across various hypotheses, our comprehensive illustrations offer methodological implications on how the confounding selection impacts the final causal target parameter estimation while generating causality insights in demystifying the "gut-brain axis". Our results highlighted the practicality and necessity of the discussed methods, which not only guide real-world applications for practitioners but also motivate future advancements for this crucial topic in the era of big data.

Double machine learning and automated confounder selection: A cautionary tale

Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions

Estimating Identifiable Causal Effects through Double Machine Learning

Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Models with Fixed Effects

Estimating Causal Effects with Double Machine Learning -- A Method Evaluation

Anytime-Valid Inference for Double/Debiased Machine Learning of Causal Parameters

High-dimensional confounding in causal mediation: a comparison study of double machine learning and regularized partial correlation network

Causal mediation analysis with double machine learning

Robust double machine learning model with application to omics data

Learning Decision Policies with Instrumental Variables through Double Machine Learning

What, Why, and How: an Empiricist's Guide to Double/Debiased Machine Learning

Using Double Machine Learning to Understand Nonresponse in the Recruitment of a Mixed-Mode Online Panel

False discovery control for penalized variable selections with high-dimensional covariates.

Double Machine Learning for Adaptive Causal Representation in High-Dimensional Data

Counterfactually Fair Regression with Double Machine Learning

ddml: Double/debiased machine learning in Stata

A New Covariate Selection Strategy for High Dimensional Data in Causal Effect Estimation with Multivariate Treatments

Robust Orthogonal Machine Learning of Treatment Effects

Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment

Hyperparameter Tuning for Causal Inference with Double Machine Learning: A Simulation Study

Variable Selection in High-Dimensional Error-in-Variables Models Via Controlling the False Discovery Proportion