Abstract:Machine Learning techniques have become pervasive across a range of different applications, and are now widely used in areas as disparate as recidivism prediction, consumer credit-risk analysis and insurance pricing. The prevalence of machine learning techniques has raised concerns about the potential for learned algorithms to become biased against certain groups. Many definitions have been proposed in the literature, but the fundamental task of reasoning about probabilistic events is a challenging one, owing to the intractability of inference. The focus of this paper is taking steps towards the application of tractable models to fairness. Tractable probabilistic models have emerged that guarantee that conditional marginal can be computed in time linear in the size of the model. In particular, we show that sum product networks (SPNs) enable an effective technique for determining the statistical relationships between protected attributes and other training variables. If a subset of these training variables are found by the SPN to be independent of the training attribute then they can be considered `safe' variables, from which we can train a classification model without concern that the resulting classifier will result in disparate outcomes for different demographic groups. Our initial experiments on the `German Credit' data set indicate that this processing technique significantly reduces disparate treatment of male and female credit applicants, with a small reduction in classification accuracy compared to state of the art. We will also motivate the concept of "fairness through percentile equivalence", a new definition predicated on the notion that individuals at the same percentile of their respective distributions should be treated equivalently, and this prevents unfair penalisation of those individuals who lie at the extremities of their respective distributions.

Counterfactually Fair Regression with Double Machine Learning

Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions

Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action via Counterfactual Predictions

Fairness Implications of Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation with Machine Learning Methods in Policy-making

Estimating Identifiable Causal Effects through Double Machine Learning

Estimating Causal Effects with Double Machine Learning -- A Method Evaluation

Counterfactual Fair Opportunity: Measuring Decision Model Fairness with Counterfactual Reasoning

Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions

Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Prediction

Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Models with Fixed Effects

Anytime-Valid Inference for Double/Debiased Machine Learning of Causal Parameters

Ensuring Equitable Financial Decisions: Leveraging Counterfactual Fairness and Deep Learning for Bias

An Empirical Comparison of Bias Reduction Methods on Real-World Problems in High-Stakes Policy Settings

Counterfactually Fair Representation

Causal Fair Machine Learning via Rank-Preserving Interventional Distributions

Counterpart Fairness -- Addressing Systematic between-group Differences in Fairness Evaluation

Fairness in Machine Learning with Tractable Models

Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness

DoubleML: An Object-Oriented Implementation of Double Machine Learning in R

Counterfactual Fairness Is Basically Demographic Parity

State of the Art in Fair ML: From Moral Philosophy and Legislation to Fair Classifiers