Abstract:Machine Learning techniques have become pervasive across a range of different applications, and are now widely used in areas as disparate as recidivism prediction, consumer credit-risk analysis and insurance pricing. The prevalence of machine learning techniques has raised concerns about the potential for learned algorithms to become biased against certain groups. Many definitions have been proposed in the literature, but the fundamental task of reasoning about probabilistic events is a challenging one, owing to the intractability of inference. The focus of this paper is taking steps towards the application of tractable models to fairness. Tractable probabilistic models have emerged that guarantee that conditional marginal can be computed in time linear in the size of the model. In particular, we show that sum product networks (SPNs) enable an effective technique for determining the statistical relationships between protected attributes and other training variables. If a subset of these training variables are found by the SPN to be independent of the training attribute then they can be considered `safe' variables, from which we can train a classification model without concern that the resulting classifier will result in disparate outcomes for different demographic groups. Our initial experiments on the `German Credit' data set indicate that this processing technique significantly reduces disparate treatment of male and female credit applicants, with a small reduction in classification accuracy compared to state of the art. We will also motivate the concept of "fairness through percentile equivalence", a new definition predicated on the notion that individuals at the same percentile of their respective distributions should be treated equivalently, and this prevents unfair penalisation of those individuals who lie at the extremities of their respective distributions.

State of the Art in Fair ML: From Moral Philosophy and Legislation to Fair Classifiers

Fairness-aware machine learning: a perspective

Can Everyday AI be Ethical? Machine Learning Algorithm Fairness

Can everyday AI be ethical. Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms

A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning

Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy

Compatibility of Fairness Metrics with EU Non-Discrimination Laws: Demographic Parity & Conditional Demographic Disparity

The invisible power of fairness. How machine learning shapes democracy

Analyzing Fairness of Classification Machine Learning Model with Structured Dataset

An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Solutions to the Problems of Algorithmic Discrimination

Multi-dimensional discrimination in Law and Machine Learning -- A comparative overview

Fairness in Machine Learning with Tractable Models

Insurance Discrimination and Fairness in Machine Learning: An Ethical Analysis

Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law

Developing a Philosophical Framework for Fair Machine Learning: Lessons From The Case of Algorithmic Collusion

Analyzing Fairness of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing Models

Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study

Aleatoric and Epistemic Discrimination: Fundamental Limits of Fairness Interventions

Machine Decisions and Human Consequences

What Is Fairness? On the Role of Protected Attributes and Fictitious Worlds

AI’s fairness problem: understanding wrongful discrimination in the context of automated decision-making