Abstract:The auxiliary boundary condition must be specified for the discontinuous finite element methods (e.g., DG, SD, FR/CPR) to evaluate the solution gradients. Since the velocity gradient near the wall is not fully resolved in the WMLES grid, we recommend a looser auxiliary condition than the usual no‐slip condition. Superior performance of the proposed WMLES framework was confirmed for a benchmarking non‐equilibrium periodic hill flow with curvilinear walls compared to the results of an algebraic WMLES and a DDES. Summary To robustly and accurately simulate wall‐bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers, we propose suitable boundary treatments for wall‐modeled large‐eddy simulation (WMLES) coupled with a high‐order flux reconstruction (FR) method. First, we show the need to impose an auxiliary boundary condition on auxiliary variables (solution gradients) that are commonly introduced in high‐order discontinuous finite element methods (DFEMs). Auxiliary boundary conditions are introduced in WMLES, where the grid resolution is too coarse to resolve the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer. Another boundary treatment to further enhance stability with under‐resolved grids, is the use of a modal filter only in the wall‐normal direction of wall‐adjacent cells to remove the oscillations. A grid convergence study of turbulent channel flow with a high Reynolds number (Reτ≈5200 ) shows that the present WMLES framework accurately predicts velocity profiles, Reynolds shear stress, and skin friction coefficients at the grid resolutions recommended in the literature. It was confirmed that a small amount of filtering is sufficient to stabilize computation, with negligible influence on prediction accuracy. In addition, non‐equilibrium periodic hill flow with a curved wall, including flow separation, reattachment, and acceleration at a high Reynolds number (Reh≈37,000 ), is reported. Considering stability and the prediction accuracy, we recommend a loose auxiliary wall boundary conditions with a less steep velocity gradient for WMLES using high‐order DFEMs.

Grid Convergence Properties of Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations in the Asymptotic Regime

On the grid convergence of wall-modeled large-eddy simulation

A Comparative Study on the Large-Scale-resolving Capability of Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation

Constrained Large Eddy Simulation of Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows

A Total-Shear-stress-conserved Wall Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of High-Reynolds Number Wall Turbulence

Predictive accuracy of wall-modelled large-eddy simulation on unstructured grids

Large-Eddy Simulation of Separated Flows On Unconventionally Coarse Grids

On robust boundary treatments for wall‐modeled LES with high‐order discontinuous finite element methods

A dynamic linearized wall model for turbulent flow simulation: towards grid convergence in wall-modeled simulations

Sensitivity analysis of wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for separated turbulent flow

An Improved Surface Boundary Condition for Large-Eddy Simulations Based on Monin–Obukhov Similarity Theory: Evaluation and Consequences for Grid Convergence in Neutral and Stable Conditions

LES Wall Modeling for Heat Transfer at High Speeds

Zonal Embedded Grids for LES of Self-Sustaining Structures of Wall Turbulence

Wall-resolved and wall-modelled large-eddy simulation of plane Couette flow

Calibrating sub-grid scale models for high-order wall-modeled large eddy simulation

A wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of the unsteady flow in a water-jet pump based on the turbulent length scales

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Non-Newtonian Power-Law Fluid Flows

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Unstructured-Grid Navier–Stokes Solvers

Toward a flow-structure-based wall-modeled large-eddy simulation paradigm

Reynolds-Number-Dependence of Length Scales Governing Turbulent-Flow Separation in Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulation