Abstract:The auxiliary boundary condition must be specified for the discontinuous finite element methods (e.g., DG, SD, FR/CPR) to evaluate the solution gradients. Since the velocity gradient near the wall is not fully resolved in the WMLES grid, we recommend a looser auxiliary condition than the usual no‐slip condition. Superior performance of the proposed WMLES framework was confirmed for a benchmarking non‐equilibrium periodic hill flow with curvilinear walls compared to the results of an algebraic WMLES and a DDES. Summary To robustly and accurately simulate wall‐bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers, we propose suitable boundary treatments for wall‐modeled large‐eddy simulation (WMLES) coupled with a high‐order flux reconstruction (FR) method. First, we show the need to impose an auxiliary boundary condition on auxiliary variables (solution gradients) that are commonly introduced in high‐order discontinuous finite element methods (DFEMs). Auxiliary boundary conditions are introduced in WMLES, where the grid resolution is too coarse to resolve the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer. Another boundary treatment to further enhance stability with under‐resolved grids, is the use of a modal filter only in the wall‐normal direction of wall‐adjacent cells to remove the oscillations. A grid convergence study of turbulent channel flow with a high Reynolds number (Reτ≈5200 ) shows that the present WMLES framework accurately predicts velocity profiles, Reynolds shear stress, and skin friction coefficients at the grid resolutions recommended in the literature. It was confirmed that a small amount of filtering is sufficient to stabilize computation, with negligible influence on prediction accuracy. In addition, non‐equilibrium periodic hill flow with a curved wall, including flow separation, reattachment, and acceleration at a high Reynolds number (Reh≈37,000 ), is reported. Considering stability and the prediction accuracy, we recommend a loose auxiliary wall boundary conditions with a less steep velocity gradient for WMLES using high‐order DFEMs.

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Non-Newtonian Power-Law Fluid Flows

Numerical Analysis of the Micro-Couette Flow Using a Non-Newton–fourier Model with Enhanced Wall Boundary Conditions

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Unstructured-Grid Navier–Stokes Solvers

A Total-Shear-stress-conserved Wall Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of High-Reynolds Number Wall Turbulence

Wall-modeled Large Eddy Simulation for the Flows Around an Axisymmetric Body of Revolution

A Novel Wall Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of the Flow Around a Circular Cylinder

Toward a flow-structure-based wall-modeled large-eddy simulation paradigm

A Comparative Study on the Large-Scale-resolving Capability of Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation

Numerical analysis of turbulent fluctuations around an axisymmetric body of revolution based on wall-modeled large eddy simulations

Machine learning building-block-flow wall model for large-eddy simulation

Assessment of Subgrid-Scale Models in Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Channel Flows

Wall Boundary Conditions for RANS Modelling of Unidirectional and Oscillatory Boundary-Layer Flows

On robust boundary treatments for wall‐modeled LES with high‐order discontinuous finite element methods

A Library for Wall-Modelled Large-Eddy Simulation Based on OpenFOAM Technology

Wall-modeled large eddy simulation in the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method

A new ODE-based turbulence wall model accounting for pressure gradient and Reynolds number effects

A wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of the unsteady flow in a water-jet pump based on the turbulent length scales

Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation based on building-block flows

A wall model for large-eddy simulation of highly compressible flows based on a new scaling of the law of the wall

LES Wall Modeling for Heat Transfer at High Speeds

Machine-learning wall-model large-eddy simulation accounting for isotropic roughness under local equilibrium