Abstract:The European Commission has proposed a new regulatory tool to govern of digital markets. The Digital Markets Act (DMA) intents to limit the market behavior of so-called gatekeepers to ensure contestable and fair digital markets. We review the provisions of the DMA both from a legal and from an economic perspective. Notwithstanding a number of benefits, we identify several issues with the current proposal. When looking at the core provisions of the proposal from an economic perspective, a number of of contention arise: many of the provisions seem to be quite narrow in scope and it seems difficult to extrapolate more general rules from them; the economic harm of some of the provisions is both uncertain and in principle debatable; the alleged (self-executing; non self-executing) distinction between different types of obligations cannot be verified; and, in addition, Art. 5–7 DMA seem to contain three distinct regulatory instruments; last but not least, while the DMA seeks to control existing gatekeepers, the "tipping" of markets and the rise of further gatekeepers is not guaranteed by the proposed regulation, this in turn leads to a larger critical analysis of the gatekeeper as the DMA's norm addressee. While the goals and nature of the DMA have gained in clarity throughout the legislative process, its scope remains somewhat obtuse. On the one hand it seems set on regulating gatekeepers as they exist today, on the other, it also aims to bring about systemic change in the digital single market. How it expects to achieve the latter is not entirely clear. On closer examination, the DMA also contains a complex enforcement regime that not only depends on the compliance of gatekeepers but may also forestall the envisioned speed and efficacy of the instrumment. In this light and by critically looking at the nature of ex ante and ex post measures in broader competition policy, we conclude that a reform of the competition policy regime would better suit the overalls aims of reining in big tech in future.

Competition law and policy of the ASEAN member states for the digital economy: a proposal for greater harmonization

Does China need competition law?

ASEAN and the Regime Complex for Digital Trade in the Asia-Pacific

Facilitating Data Flows Across ASEAN: Challenges and Policy Directions

Competition Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Developing a Template for a Multilateral Framework

Strategic Interaction between the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework and Southeast Asia:Focus on the Domain of Digital Economy

Foreign Experience of Competition Policy in Digital Economy

Approaches to Digital Trade and Data Flow Regulation Across Jurisdictions: Implications for the Future ASEAN-EU Agreement

China-ASEAN Digital Economic Cooperation and Its Challenges in the Context of US Indo-Pacific Strategy

Analysis of Malaysian Competition Law and Policies in the E-Commerce Platforms Market

Digital Transformation and Business Competition Challenges Comparative Analysis of Antitrust Law

The New Digital Platforms: Merger Control in Pakistan

EU digital economy competition policy: From ex-post to ex-ante. The case of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Meta

Association of Southeast Asian Nations Economic Integration: Addressing Challenges and Embracing Opportunities

Governing AI in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's way forward

China and EU's Wisdom in Choosing Competition Soft Law or Hard Law in the Digital Era: a Perfect Match?

Competitiveness without Competition: The Role of Antitrust Law in the Development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Introduction to China’s Past, Present and Future

Regulating Big Tech: From Competition Policy to Sector Regulation?

Toward a more robust competition policy regime for Hong Kong

Competition policy reform in Europe and Germany – institutional change in the light of digitization