Abstract:Abstract Increasingly, the economy of industrialised countries moves away from being based on a multiplicity of independent innovators to one characterised by cross-licensing and the pooling of intellectual property (IP) rights. Competition law is accorded a more limited role. Refusals to license or restrictive licence terms are tolerated. This paradigm emphasises the innovation at the expense of the dissemination rationale of IP and competition law. The pressure on developing countries is to follow suit. However, this approach jeopardises overcoming the technology dependence of these states. Yet, the political consensus underlying the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) was that, in exchange for IP rights protection, a transfer and dissemination of technology benefiting the global South would occur. This has not taken place so far. Taking this promise seriously requires according an enhanced, more social role to competition law. Articles 8(2), 31 and 40 of TRIPS – the TRIPS competition rules – could be interpreted in a way to accomplish this. This article argues in favour of a “prodevelopment” approach to IP-related competition law. This could be viewed as a demand of the rule of law at the international level. On the one hand, treaties such as TRIPS are to be interpreted in good faith. On the other, public interest and human rights considerations justify, as it were, require, such an approach. Articles 7 and 8 of TRIPS can play a crucial role in this regard. They reflect such public interest considerations as “object and purpose” of TRIPS. They also provide a link to international human rights law (IHRL). IHRL protects a (group) right to development, confirming “policy space” for World Trade Organization (WTO) members and the freedom to opt for a competition law model that facilitates dissemination. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) further protects various economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications (REBSPA). These rights may be said to give rise to “transfer and dissemination of technology” as a human right. Duties under the right to development and “territorial” and “extraterritorial” human rights obligations (ETOs) under the ICESCR support an understanding of competition law which is pro development, which takes account of local access and welfare needs. The article concludes with a set of 10 consolidated considerations for a “prodevelopment” IP-related competition law.

Competition Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Developing a Template for a Multilateral Framework

Does China need competition law?

Competition law and policy of the ASEAN member states for the digital economy: a proposal for greater harmonization

The Interaction of Trade and Competition Policy in the Globalization Process

Competitiveness without Competition: The Role of Antitrust Law in the Development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Multilateralization of International Investment Law

Toward a more robust competition policy regime for Hong Kong

Small State Diplomacy in Action: The Real Origins of TPP

Reductionist Intellectual Property Protection and Expansionist (and “Prodevelopment”) Competition Rules as a Human Rights Imperative? Enhancing Technology Transfer to the Global South

ASEAN at the Crossroads: Trap and Track between CPTPP and RCEP

China's Free Trade Agreement Strategies

The New Gold Standard? Empirically Situating the Trans-Pacific Partnership in the Investment Treaty Universe

Asia–Pacific Integration Within a Broader Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

Public Sector Restraints: Behind-the-Border Trade Barriers

Competition policy’s role in the economic recovery process from the Covid-19 pandemic crisis—insight from UNCTAD

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: intellectual property and trade in the Asia-Pacific

Trade, investment and the global economy: Are we entering a new era for health?

Regulatory Cooperation in Mega-Regional Trade Agreements

TPP and China's Economic Integration Law Development or Countermeasures

Mega FTAs in East Asia and Their Strategies: Competition and Cooperation by Reshaping Global Supply and Value Chains

Stipulating Investors’ Obligations in Investment Agreements as a Suitable Regulatory Approach to Prevent and Remedy Anti-Competitive Behaviour?