Single or continuous multiple intravenous re-induction in Crohn's disease patients who lost response to ustekinumab: Evidence from real-world data

Jian Tang,Qing Li,Zhaopeng Huang,Lishuo Shi,Qin Guo,Miao Li,Xiang Gao,Kang Chao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.189
IF: 5.165
2024-01-29
Digestive and Liver Disease
Abstract:Background and Aims Re-induction optimization of ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease (CD) patients who experienced a loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab. However, whether continuous multiple intravenous optimization is better than single dose re-induction remains unknown. We aimed to compare effectiveness of two strategies in CD patients with LOR to ustekinumab. Methods We retrospectively included CD patients who had LOR to standardized ustekinumab therapy. They were divided into three groups according to different times (one to three) for re-induction. Results This study included 50, 26 and 22 of 98 eligible patients in one intravenous re-induction subgroup, double intravenous re-induction subgroup and three intravenous re-induction subgroup, respectively. At week 24, 67.3%, 75.5%, 56.6%, 69.8% and 61.2% of all achieved steriod free clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response and C-reactive protein normalization, respectively. No differences were found in all endpoints between three groups. Ustekinumab trough level at week 24 but not times of re-induction showed a tendency to predict clinical remission. No serious adverse events were found in this cohort. Conclusion Intravenous re-induction was safe and effective in CD patients who experienced LOR to ustekinumab. Trough level of ustekinumab but not times of intravenous re-induction may associated with clinical efficacy.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?