P994 Single center assessment of intravenous ustekinumab maintenance in Crohn’s disease

S J Fernández Prada,E A Fuentes-Valenzuela,J Barrio Andrés,Á De Prado Santos,M Á Marinero Muñoz,R Calleja Carbajosa,F J García Alonso
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.1124
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is usually employed in Crohn’s disease (CD) after anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy failure or if anti-TNF therapy is contraindicated. Higher UST trough levels have been associated with better clinical/endoscopic outcomes, so dose escalation (reducing dosing intervals or reinduction) is widely used. Intravenous (iv) maintenance has been proposed, but it has been barely assessed. Methods Single center, retrospective case series. All patients with CD starting treatment with UST and receiving at least one dose were eligible. Subjects started on UST in other centers or those prescribed for any indication different than IBD were excluded. Dose escalation to iv maintenance was performed in case of lack or loss of response or persisting significant inflammation in laboratory tests, imaging or endoscopy. Following dose escalation, Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI), fecal calprotectin and C reactive protein (CRP) were checked at each visit. UST trough levels were also assessed. Primary outcomes were clinical remission (HBI<5) and biochemical remission (fecal calprotectin <250 mg/kg). Adverse events, and treatment persistence were also assessed. Results A total of 131 patients treated between May 2017 and August 2023 were included. Sixty (45.8%) patients were escalated to iv UST maintenance after a median of 14.1 (IQR: 8-50.4) weeks of UST treatment. Baseline characteristics are shown in table 1. Patients were started on iv UST maintenance due to persistent inflammatory activity in imaging/endoscopic procedures in 21 (35%), clinical response without remission in 17 (28.3%), low trough concentrations in 16 (26.7%) and primary non-response in 6 (10%). Thirty-three (55%) were receiving sc UST every 4 weeks and 23 (38.3%) started iv maintenance directly after UST induction. At initiation of iv maintenance, patients presented a median HBI index of 4 (IQR: 2-7), a fecal calprotectin of 514 (IQR: 213-1078) mg/kg and UST trough levels of 4.8 (IQR: 3-7.3) μg/mL. Following iv maintenance, UST trough levels increased to 10.9 (IQR: 8-17.4). Clinical remission rates increased from baseline (48.3%) at weeks 8 (79.6%, p=0.001), 24 (72%, p=0.01) and 48 (74.4%, p=0.01). However, the 10-13% increase observed in the biochemical remission rates was not statistically significant (figure 1). Treatment persistence 2 years after starting UST iv maintenance was 72.2% (95% CI: 54.7-83.8%). Only 2 infectious adverse events were observed in the whole cohort (2/131, 1.6%), both in patients receiving sc maintenance. Conclusion UST iv maintenance in bio-experienced patients is safe and increases clinical remission rates, although it did not achieve a relevant improvement in biochemical remission rates.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?