Abstract:Aim: This randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the effect of instrumentation kinematics (reciprocation or continuous rotation) on bacterial reduction, post-operative pain, and incidence of flare-ups after root canal treatment of single-rooted mandibular premolars with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Methodology: Sixty-six patients were included in this prospective, parallel, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (N = 33) according to the kinematics of the shaping instrument: WaveOne Gold (WO) used in reciprocation or One Shape (OS) used in continuous rotation. Under complete asepsis, bacterial samples were taken before (S1) and after (S2) a standard cleaning and shaping protocol. Evaluation of bacterial reduction was done by both culture technique and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis. Post-operative pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) after 24, 48, and 72 h following treatment, while flare-ups were recorded as a binary outcome (Yes/No). Independent and paired t-tests were used for inter- and intra-group comparisons for bacterial count data, respectively. For post-operative pain score, inter-group comparisons were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test while intra-group comparisons were analyzed using Friedman test followed by pairwise comparisons utilizing the Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. The significance level was set at p ≤ .05 within all tests. Results: All the allocated participants received the intervention and were analysed. The comparison between culture and qPCR methods showed that qPCR analysis demonstrated significantly higher pre-instrumentation baseline bacterial count (p < .05). The percentage of bacterial reduction, detected by either method, significantly decreased after instrumentation using either rotation or reciprocation kinematics (p < .05). However, the difference between the WOG or OS files was statistically non-significant (p > .05). The intra-group comparisons showed a significant reduction in post-operative pain with time (p < .05) for both groups. However, the inter-group comparison demonstrated that the difference in post-operative pain after the use of either WOG or OS was statistically non-significant (p > .05). The incidence of flare-ups between both groups was also not-significant (p = 1). Conclusions: Shaping kinematics, either rotation or reciprocation motions, had no impact on bacterial reduction and the incidence of post-operative pain and flare-ups after root canal preparation of single-rooted premolars with asymptomatic apical periodontitis.

Effect of different instrumentation techniques on students' performance and outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment

Radiographic assessment of endodontic mishaps in an undergraduate student clinic: a 2-year retrospective study

A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques

Comparison of procedural errors resulting during root canal preparations completed by senior dental students in patients using an '8-step method' versus 'serial step-back technique'

Instrumentation time and effectiveness of hand and rotary files in a prototyped second mandibular primary molar: A micro-CT study

Evaluation of the Impact of Different Instrumentation Techniques on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Root Canal Treatment

Instrumentation kinematics does not affect bacterial reduction, post-operative pain, and flare-ups: A randomized clinical trial

Microscopic Evaluation of Dentinal Defects after Root Canal Preparation with Different Hand and Nickel-Titanium Files; An In Vitro Study

Effect of errorless learning on the acquisition of fine motor skills in pre-clinical endodontics

The Effect of a Manual Instrumentation Technique on Five Types of Premolar Root Canal Geometry Assessed by Microcomputed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction.

Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial

Comparison of procedural errors resulting during root canal preparations completed by junior dental students in patients using an '8-step method' versus 'serial step-back technique.'

Effect of Different Preparation Techniques on Root Canal Geometry: An In Vitro Study

Molar root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students; an observational study of procedural errors and student perception

Effect of Different Nickel–Titanium Rotary Systems on Dentinal Crack Formation During Root Canal Preparation in Primary Molars: An in Vitro Study

Effect of Autoclave Sterilization on the Number of Uses and Resistance to Cyclic Fatigue of WaveOne Gold and Four Replica-Like Endodontic Instruments

Assessment of Incidence, Management and Contributory Factors of Root Canal Instrument Separation in an Endodontics Post- Graduate Program: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Investigation of fracture prevalence of instruments used in root canal treatments at a faculty of dentistry: a prospective study

Quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students at the Wits Oral Health Centre

Experimental Study on Effects of Root Canal Preparation by Different Instrumentation

Influence of operator's experience on complications of root canal treatment using contemporary techniques: a retrospective study