Abstract:Coastal ecosystems are under pressure from a vast array of anthropogenic stressors, including development and climate change, resulting in significant habitat losses globally Conservation policies are often implemented with the intent of reducing habitat loss. However, losses already incurred will require restoration if ecosystem functions and services are to be recovered. The United States has a long history of wetland loss and recognizes that averting loss requires a multi-pronged approach including mitigation for regulated activities and non-mitigation (voluntary herein) restoration. The 1989 "No Net Loss" (NNL) policy stated the Federal government's intent that losses of wetlands would be offset by at least as many gains of wetlands. However, coastal wetlands losses result from both regulated and non-regulated activities. We examined the effectiveness of Federally funded, voluntary restoration efforts in helping avert losses of coastal wetlands by assessing: (1) What are the current and past trends in coastal wetland change in the U.S.?; and (2) How much and where are voluntary restoration efforts occurring? First, we calculated palustrine and estuarine wetland change in U.S. coastal shoreline counties using data from NOAA's Coastal Change Analysis Program, which integrates both types of potential losses and gains. We then synthesized available data on Federally funded, voluntary restoration of coastal wetlands. We found that from 1996 to 2010, the U.S. lost 139,552 acres (~565 km2) of estuarine wetlands (2.5% of 1996 area) and 336,922 acres (~1,363 km2) of palustrine wetlands (1.4%). From 2006 to 2015, restoration of 145,442 acres (~589 km2) of estuarine wetlands and 154,772 acres (~626 km2) of palustrine wetlands occurred. Further, wetland losses and restoration were not always geographically aligned, resulting in local and regional "winners" and "losers." While these restoration efforts have been considerable, restoration and mitigation collectively have not been able to keep pace with wetland losses; thus, reversing this trend will likely require greater investment in coastal habitat conservation and restoration efforts. We further conclude that "area restored," the most prevalent metric used to assess progress, is inadequate, as it does not necessarily equate to restoration of functions. Assessing the effectiveness of wetland restoration not just in the U.S., but globally, will require allocation of sufficient funding for long-term monitoring of restored wetland functions, as well as implementation of standardized methods for monitoring data collection, synthesis, interpretation, and application.

When mitigation is not "just mitigation": Defining (and diffusing) tensions between climate mitigation, adaptation, and justice

Case for equity between Paris Climate agreement's Co-benefits and adaptation

Climate change mitigation-adaptation relationships in forest management: perspectives from the fire-prone American West

Integrating principles and tools of decision science into value-driven watershed planning for compensatory mitigation

Measuring the success of climate change adaptation and mitigation in terrestrial ecosystems

Adaptation and mitigation for combating climate change – from single to joint

Unequal considerations of justice in municipal adaptation planning: an assessment of US climate plans over time and by context

The Risk and Policy Space for Loss and Damage: Integrating Notions of Distributive and Compensatory Justice with Comprehensive Climate Risk Management

Voluntary Restoration: Mitigation's Silent Partner in the Quest to Reverse Coastal Wetland Loss in the USA

Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation

Climate change mitigation potential of wetlands and the cost-effectiveness of their restoration

Creating Strategic Reserves to Protect Forest Carbon and Reduce Biodiversity Losses in the United States

Marine reserves can mitigate and promote adaptation to climate change

Socioeconomic distributional impacts of evaluating flood mitigation activities using equity-weighted benefit-cost analysis

Tidal and nontidal marsh restoration: a trade‐off between carbon sequestration, methane emissions, and soil accretion

Displacement Induced by Climate Change Adaptation: The Case of ‘Climate Buffer’ Infrastructure

Effective climate action must integrate climate adaptation and mitigation

Uncertain Pathways to a Future Safe Climate

Justice considerations in climate research

Unintended consequences of climate change mitigation for African river basins

Climate Justice and Climate Adaptation in California: Indigenous Community Climate Adaptation Leadership and Opportunities for Scientific Collaboration