Abstract:Sea-level rise due to climate change will have significant effects on coastal areas and populations. Adaptation policies recommend the managed realignment of the most vulnerable assets and activities. Despite their medium- and long-term benefits, these policies face significant friction due to social acceptability in the communities where they are implemented. This article investigates the hypothesis that respecting principles of justice in the implementation of managed realignment should increase its acceptability. We compare preferences of those people who are exposed to the risk of climate-change-induced flooding and those who are not, as regards funding managed retreat policies and defining compensation criteria for assets at risk. The main theories of social justice provide the four principles included in the analysis: efficiency, need, responsibility and priority assigned to property rights. A choice experiment survey was conducted with 258 residents of coastal and hinterland communities in the south of France. Four attributes were selected to define the managed realignment policy: the dialogue arrangements, the implementation period, the policy implementation schedule and the cost. The results show support for a relatively fast launch of these policies (within 15 years) but in stages and through a process of dialogue with the population. People's perceptions of the funding criteria reveal a preference for national solidarity. Finally, national funding of managed retreat policies and compensation criteria based on market prices have a significant positive influence on the acceptability of managed realignment policies, whereas introducing responsibility-based compensation criteria tends to favour the status quo over the adaptation policy. Policy relevance Prioritization of the funding criteria reveals the preference for national solidarity. Preferences for the justice criteria underpinning compensation reveal a great diversity of values. Besides implantation modalities, preferences for managed realignment policies depend on which level they are implemented at, on the expropriation criteria (the emphasis given to property rights, i.e. market price), on the attachment (people perceived as worst off, i.e. the property is their main residence rather than a second home or they have lower levels of income) and on the degree of responsibility (related to the date of purchase, i.e. on the information given at the time on the risk).

Unequal considerations of justice in municipal adaptation planning: an assessment of US climate plans over time and by context

Climate change adaptation plans: Inclusion of health, equity, and green space

A scoping review of equitable climate adaptation research in U.S. cities

A bibliometric and topic analysis of climate justice: Mapping trends, voices, and the way forward

The Role of Non-Climate Data in Equitable Climate Adaptation Planning: Lessons from Small French and American Cities

Urban sustainability and environmental justice: evaluating the linkages in public planning/policy discourse

Mapping supply of and demand for ecosystem services to assess environmental justice in New York City

Translating and embedding equity-thinking into climate adaptation: an analysis of US cities

Cause-related injustice, process-related injustice, effect-related injustice and regional heat action planning priorities: An empirical study in Yangtze River Delta and Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomerations

An agenda for ethics and justice in adaptation to climate change

Climate Change Policies and Older Adults: An Analysis of States' Climate Adaptation Plans

Weaving notions of justice into urban ecosystem services research and practice

Climate change and municipal finance: Ordinary innovations for just urban transitions

How can policy and policymaking foster climate justice? A qualitative systematic review

Reclaiming justice for energy-vulnerable populations: Evidence from the city of los angeles

Intersectional climate action: the role of community-based organisations in urban climate justice

Vulnerability locked in. On the need to engage the outside of the adaptation box

Impact of justice and solidarity variables on the acceptability of managed realignment

Blinders of extreme heat adaptation: uneven urban development and the reproduction of vulnerabilities

Justice considerations in climate research

Climate Justice and Climate Adaptation in California: Indigenous Community Climate Adaptation Leadership and Opportunities for Scientific Collaboration