The Effects of Different Reconstructions of Medial Column Support on Clinical Outcomes after Locked Plating of Proximal Humerus Fractures
曾浪清,陈云丰,唐三元,杨辉,魏海峰,宋文奇,王磊,潘垚,张闻
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2014.01.003
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of different reconstructions of the medial support on the clinical outcomes of locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.Methods Between June 2005 and June 2011,130 patients underwent locked plating of proximal humerus fracture and completed follow-ups in our department.They were 46 men and 84 women,18 to 88 years of age (average,56.1 years).By the Neer classification,56 cases were two-part fractures,52 three-part fractures and 22 four-part fractures.They were categorized into 4 groups according to the 4 different reconstructions of medial support of the proximal humerus.In the CS (cortical support) group,60 patients had the reconstruction by anatomic reduction of the cortical bone; in the MS (multi-screw support) group,12 patients had the reconstruction by insertion of more than 2 medial support screws; in the SS (single-screw support) group,17 patients had the reconstruction by insertion of only one medial support screw; in the NS group,41 patients had no reconstruction of medial support of the proximal humerus.The postoperative Constant scores of the shoulder function,visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores,loss of the head-shaft angle,complications and reoperation rates were compared among the 4 groups.Results The follow-ups for the patients ranged from 12 to 42 months (mean,18.8 months).At the last follow-up,the CS,MS,SS and NS groups had a mean Constant score of 81.2 ± 12.7,75.5±9.7,69.4±12.1 and 67.5±11.6,respectively; a mean VAS score of 1.4±1.9,1.7±1.6,2.5 ± 2.2 and 3.2 ± 2.4,respectively; a mean loss of the head-shaft angle of 0.8° ± 1.0°,1.4° ± 2.3°,3.4° ± 6.8° and 4.4° ± 4.0°,respectively.With respect to the 3 indexes,there were no significant differences between the CS and MS groups (P ＞ 0.05),there were significant differences between the CS group and respectively the SS and NS groups (P ＜ 0.05),and there were also significant differences between the MS and NS groups (P ＜ 0.05).However,there were no significant differences between any 2 of the 4 groups regarding postoperative complications or the reoperation rate.Conclusions Anatomic reduction with the medial cortical contact is preferable in reconstruction of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.However,medial support with multiple medial support screws may help enhance the mechanical stability of the bone-implant construct,especially in cases of medial comminution,bone defects or malreduction of the medial cortical bone.