Abstract:Objective: Introduction: The article is devoted to the research of topical issues of ensuring the rights of persons suffering from mental disorders and who are subject to criminal proceedings on the application of compulsory medical measures (hereinafter - CMM). The research was conducted in the context of international standards and interpretative practice of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the ECHR or the Court). The aim: The aim of this study is to analyze international acts concerning the protection of the rights of mentally ill persons when applying compulsory medical measures; to highlight and analyze the ECHR's key positions in the context of respect for the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Convention)) and the right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention) in criminal proceedings concerning the use of CMM; to analyse the law enforcement practice and activities of psychiatrist experts on compliance with European standards for the protection of the rights of persons with mental disorders who are subject to criminal proceedings. Patients and methods: Materials and methods: rescent scientific researches; provisions of international legal acts in the field of psychiatric care; the legal standpoint of the ECHR in respecting the rights of persons with mental disorders (15 decisions were analyzed in which the ECHR addressed these issues in the context of the requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention); criminal procedural legislation of foreign states (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, Estonia, Uzbekistan, Germany); the results of the survey of 20 psychiatrists and experts conducted by the authors were used in this article To achieve this aim of research process a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, including comparative and legal method, system and structural method, method of generalization, method of analysis and synthesis, method of sociological research, method of expert evaluation, etc. bein used. Results: Results: summarized and generalized ECHR's standpoints concerning: a) minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and imprisoned; b) the aspects taken into account by the ECHR within each minimum condition in the context of ensuring the right to liberty and security of person (Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention); c) the peculiarities of the personal participation of an individual with a mental disorder in the judicial review of the application of CMM in terms of observing its right to a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention). The degree of extrapolation of these standpoints to the activity of psychiatrists was identified and analyzed. Conclusion: Conclusions: the current practice of applying CMM in criminal proceedings does not fully comply with the international standards and legal positions of the ECHR in terms of providing a person with a mental disorder the right to liberty and security of person and the right to a fair trial (in particular, the minimum conditions without which a person cannot be considered as "mentally ill" and be imprisoned are not always met).

The ECtHR’s suitability test in national security cases: Two models for balancing human rights and national security

Balance of Private and Public Interest Law in Matters of Restricting Human Rights for the Purposes of National Security

The case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the protection of Human Rights and freedoms in terms of national security protection

Between facts and norms: Testing compliance with Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases

The Long Walk to Strasbourg: About the Insufficient Judicial Protection in Some Areas of the Common Foreign and Security Policy before the European Union’s Accession to the ECHR

Quasi-constitutional court of human rights for Europe? Comments on Geir Ulfstein

The Protection of State Security in Cyberspace as a Justifying Ground for Restricting Constitutional Freedoms and Rights

Is China Playing by the Rules? — Assessing China’s Reservations to International Human Rights Treaties

Overview of recent cases before the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights (April 2022–September 2022)

The Narrowing of the European Court of Human Rights? Legal Diplomacy, Situational Self-Restraint, and the New Vision for the Court

European standards of respect for human rights in the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings

Convicting Peaceful Protesters: Proportionality's Proper Place at Criminal Trial

The Interrelation Between the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Schengen Agreement: The Ne Bis in Idem Example Through the CJEU Case Law

Balancing security and economics: domestic state-firm relations and investment screening mechanisms in Europe

Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests

Debating Human Security in China: Towards Discursive Power?

Constitutional Restriction on Human Rights and Freedoms in the Development of Liberal Democracy in Europe

Public Order, National Security and the Rights of Third-Country Nationals in Immigration Cases

An Individual's Right to Criminological Security: the Concept, Content, and Place in the System of National Security of the Russian Federation

The Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms

The ECHR in Action: Its Applicability and Relevance for Arbitration