Abstract:Introduction: People with psychosis show impairments in cognitive flexibility, a phenomenon that is still poorly understood. In this study, we tested if there were differences in cognitive and metacognitive processes related to rigidity in patients with psychosis. We compared individuals with dichotomous interpersonal thinking and those with flexible interpersonal thinking. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis using two groups with psychosis, one with low levels of dichotomous interpersonal thinking ( n = 42) and the other with high levels of dichotomous interpersonal thinking ( n = 43). The patients were classified by splitting interpersonal dichotomous thinking (measured using the repertory grid technique) to the median. The groups were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, a semi-structured interview to assess psychotic symptoms [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)], a self-report of cognitive insight [Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)], neurocognitive tasks [Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)], and the repertory grid technique. We used a logistic regression model to test which factors best differentiate the two groups. Results: The group with high dichotomous interpersonal thinking had earlier age at onset of the psychotic disorder, higher self-certainty, impaired executive functioning, affected abstract thinking, and lower estimated cognitive reserve than the group with flexible thinking. According to the logistic regression model, estimated cognitive reserve and self-certainty were the variables that better differentiated between the two groups. Conclusion: Cognitive rigidity may be a generalized bias that affects not only neurocognitive and metacognitive processes but also the sense of self and significant others. Patients with more dichotomous interpersonal thinking might benefit from interventions that target this cognitive bias on an integrative way and that is adapted to their general level of cognitive abilities.

Enabling or Limiting Cognitive Flexibility? Evidence of Demand for Moral Commitment

Intellectually Rigorous but Morally Tolerant: Exploring Moral Leniency as a Mediator Between Cognitive Style and "Utilitarian" Judgment

Cognitive Flexibility: Neurobehavioral Correlates of Changing One's Mind.

Cognitive Flexibility and Religious Disbelief

Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding.

Cognitive Control Promotes Either Honesty or Dishonesty, Depending on One's Moral Default

A confidence framing effect: Flexible use of evidence in metacognitive monitoring

Morality in the time of cognitive famine: The effects of memory load on cooperation and honesty

Cognitive Inflexibility Predicts Extremist Attitudes.

Cognitive control in honesty and dishonesty under different conflict scenarios: insights from reaction time

Context-Dependent Risk & Benefit Sensitivity Mediate Judgments About Cognitive Enhancement

Placing Cognitive Rigidity in Interpersonal Context in Psychosis: Relationship With Low Cognitive Reserve and High Self-Certainty

Control adjustment costs limit goal flexibility: Empirical evidence and a computational account

Implicit Morality Theories: Employees’ Beliefs About the Malleability of Moral Character Shape Their Workplace Behaviors

Variability and harshness shape flexible strategy-use in support of the constrained flexibility framework

Contradictory deviations from maximization: Environment-specific biases, or reflections of basic properties of human learning?

Selfish behavior requires top-down control of prosocial motivation

Public Opinion on Cognitive Enhancement Varies Across Different Situations

Control Limited Perceptual Decision Making

Private but Not Social Information Validity Modulates Social Conformity Bias.

Moral Chameleons: The positive association between materialism and self-interest-triggered moral flexibility