Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a contagious condition posing a major public health risk in various nations including Vietnam. In 2019, the Ministry of Health introduced tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) to treat patients with chronic HBV infection and reduce the long-term toxicity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of these two medications in individuals with HBeAg-positive chronic HBV. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included data collected from the medical records of patients with chronic HBV who visited the Liver Clinic at University Medical Center HCMC between 2018 and 2020. RESULTS: After two years of treatment, the proportion of HBeAg loss in the TAF group was twice that of the TDF group (22.4% vs. 11.2%), indicating a statistically significant difference in the probability of HBeAg loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.22; 95% CI 1.43 to 3.42; p < 0.01). Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate and ability of antiviral response between patients treated with TAF and TDF (65% vs. 54.5%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio = 1.34; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.69; p < 0.01). 93.9% of patients achieved the goal of restoring ALT to normal, a higher percentage compared to the 81.2% in the TDF group, and the likelihood of achieving normal ALT levels with TAF was greater compared to those on TDF (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.01; p < 0.01). Moreover, there was a statistically significant difference in the variation in renal function between the TAF and TDF groups. Serum creatinine levels in the TAF group increased less than those in the TDF group by 0.03 mg/dL every 6 months (95% CI -0.04 to -0.01, p < 0.01), and the eGFR in the TAF group was higher than that in the TDF group every 6 months by 2.78 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 0.98 to 4.57, p < 0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the likelihood of HBeAg seroconversion between chronic hepatitis B patients treated with TAF or TDF (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.79; 95% CI 0.91 to 3.53; p = 0.09), nor in the risk of adverse events between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio = 1.34; 95% CI 0.88 to 2.05; p = 0.17). Additionally, although the HBsAg concentration in the TAF group was lower than in the TDF group by an average of 0.05 log10 IU/mL every 6 months (95% CI -0.15 to 0.05), this difference also did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.35). DISCUSSION: TAF has been demonstrated to achieve some therapeutic efficacy goals and reduce nephrotoxicity better than TDF. However, no differences were found in seroconversion or adverse events between the patient groups.

Contributions of Cathepsin A and Carboxylesterase 1 to the hydrolysis of Tenofovir Alafenamide in the Human Liver, and the Effect of CES1 Genetic Variation on Tenofovir Alafenamide Hydrolysis

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir Amibufenamide: A Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Trial in Healthy Adult Subjects

Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: design, development, and place in therapy

Tenofovir alafenamide versus entecavir in treating patients with chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis

On The Single-Crystal Structure Of Tenofovir Alafenamide Mono-Fumarate: A Metastable Phase Featuring A Mixture Of Co-Crystal And Salt

Tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B: A real-world study

TAF and TDF attenuate liver fibrosis through NS5ATP9, TGFβ1/Smad3, and NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathways

Clinical Efficacy And Safety of Long-Term Treatment Of Tenofovir Alafenamide Vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Chronic Hepatitis B in Vietnam

Distinctive HBV Replication Capacity and Susceptibility to Tenofovir Induced by a Polymerase Point Mutation in Hepatoma Cell Lines and Primary Human Hepatocytes

TAF and TDF Attenuate Liver Fibrosis Through NS5ATP9, TGFβ1/Smad3, and NF-κB Signaling Pathways

[Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: virological and pharmacological aspects]

Comparative efficacy and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide in the initial 48-week treatment of high viral load chronic hepatitis B: A single-centre retrospective study

Comparison of the impact of tenofovir alafenamide and entecavir on declines of hepatitis B surface antigen levels

Impact of switching to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in patients with entecavir-treated chronic hepatitis B

Effect of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B

Tenofovir and adefovir down-regulate mitochondrial chaperone TRAP1 and succinate dehydrogenase subunit B to metabolically reprogram glucose metabolism and induce nephrotoxicity

Suboptimal Response to Tenofovir Alafenamide in Two Patients With HBeAg-Positive Hepatitis B: A Case Report

Role of carboxylesterase and arylacetamide deacetylase in drug metabolism, physiology, and pathology

Possible biological mechanisms of entecavir versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on reducing the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

Therapeutic effectiveness analysis of tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the treatment for chronic hepatitis B

Prospective Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate (TAF) in European Real-World Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Single-Centre Real-Word Cohort Study