Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a contagious condition posing a major public health risk in various nations including Vietnam. In 2019, the Ministry of Health introduced tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) to treat patients with chronic HBV infection and reduce the long-term toxicity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of these two medications in individuals with HBeAg-positive chronic HBV. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included data collected from the medical records of patients with chronic HBV who visited the Liver Clinic at University Medical Center HCMC between 2018 and 2020. RESULTS: After two years of treatment, the proportion of HBeAg loss in the TAF group was twice that of the TDF group (22.4% vs. 11.2%), indicating a statistically significant difference in the probability of HBeAg loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.22; 95% CI 1.43 to 3.42; p < 0.01). Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate and ability of antiviral response between patients treated with TAF and TDF (65% vs. 54.5%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio = 1.34; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.69; p < 0.01). 93.9% of patients achieved the goal of restoring ALT to normal, a higher percentage compared to the 81.2% in the TDF group, and the likelihood of achieving normal ALT levels with TAF was greater compared to those on TDF (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.01; p < 0.01). Moreover, there was a statistically significant difference in the variation in renal function between the TAF and TDF groups. Serum creatinine levels in the TAF group increased less than those in the TDF group by 0.03 mg/dL every 6 months (95% CI -0.04 to -0.01, p < 0.01), and the eGFR in the TAF group was higher than that in the TDF group every 6 months by 2.78 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI 0.98 to 4.57, p < 0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the likelihood of HBeAg seroconversion between chronic hepatitis B patients treated with TAF or TDF (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.79; 95% CI 0.91 to 3.53; p = 0.09), nor in the risk of adverse events between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio = 1.34; 95% CI 0.88 to 2.05; p = 0.17). Additionally, although the HBsAg concentration in the TAF group was lower than in the TDF group by an average of 0.05 log10 IU/mL every 6 months (95% CI -0.15 to 0.05), this difference also did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.35). DISCUSSION: TAF has been demonstrated to achieve some therapeutic efficacy goals and reduce nephrotoxicity better than TDF. However, no differences were found in seroconversion or adverse events between the patient groups.

Suboptimal Response to Tenofovir Alafenamide in Two Patients With HBeAg-Positive Hepatitis B: A Case Report

Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Genotypic Resistance to Other Nucleoside Analogues: A Prospective Study.

Advances on Tenofovir for the Treatment of Other Nucleoside Analogue Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B

Tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B: A real-world study

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for multiple nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment failure hepatitis B: Is monotherapy enough?

Virological Responses to Tenofovir Alafenamide-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy in People Living with HIV Who Had Lamivudine-Resistant and Lamivudine-Susceptible Hepatitis B Virus Coinfection

Clinical Efficacy And Safety of Long-Term Treatment Of Tenofovir Alafenamide Vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Chronic Hepatitis B in Vietnam

Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: design, development, and place in therapy

Comparative efficacy and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide in the initial 48-week treatment of high viral load chronic hepatitis B: A single-centre retrospective study

Prospective Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate (TAF) in European Real-World Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Single-Centre Real-Word Cohort Study

Tenofovir alafenamide versus entecavir in treating patients with chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis

Randomised clinical trial: efficacy of peginterferon alfa-2a in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients with lamivudine resistance.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial.

Therapeutic effectiveness analysis of tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the treatment for chronic hepatitis B

Long-Term Outcomes after Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure associated with hepatitis B

Tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Pre-Existing Mutations Related To Tenofovir In Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Long-Term Nucleos(T)Ide Analogue Drugs Treatment By Ultra-Deep Pyrosequencing

Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate therapy in subjects with positive HBV-DNA and normal levels of alanine transaminase: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Switching from combination therapy with entecavir hydrate plus tenofovir alafenamide fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B based on nucleotide sequences of hepatitis B virus pregenome RNA

[Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: virological and pharmacological aspects]