Perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in patients who had a stroke: a protocol for a qualitative study review
Hu Jiang,Yongxia Mei,Beilei Lin,Wenna Wang,Xiaoxuan Wang,Zhixin Zhao,Zhen-xiang Zhang,Jiang,H.,Mei,Y.,Lin,B.,Wang,W.,Wang,X.,Zhao,Z.,Zhang,Z.-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071964
IF: 3.006
2023-08-04
BMJ Open
Abstract:Introduction Stroke has a high incidence and disability rate, and its recurrence and readmission rates are rising, making it the second-leading cause of mortality in the globe. Cardiac rehabilitation is a well-known, evidence-based strategy that might serve as an additional preventative programme. Prior quantitative research has proven the positive results and high practicability of cardiac rehabilitation for patients who had a stroke, however, cardiac rehabilitation is not yet a routine component of stroke rehabilitation worldwide. It might be useful to conduct meta-integration of previous qualitative studies to understand if existing cardiac rehabilitation programme meets the needs of patients who had a stroke. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to combine systematically the perspectives on benefits, barriers and facilitating factors of cardiac rehabilitation in patients who had a stroke. Methods and analysis There will be a search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases. In addition, grey literature from Google Scholar, OpenGrey, PyARXiv, bioRxiv and medRxiv will also be searched. Included studies will be qualitative studies or findings from mixed-method research involving patients who engage in CR after a stroke. Regardless of the publishing date and context, English-language articles will be reviewed. Two impartial reviewers will screen studies and extract data from the included studies. According to the Joanna Briggs Institute Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care Quality Evaluation Criteria for qualitative research, the methodology of the included literature will be examined. For data synthesis, the pooling meta-integration approach and Noblit and Hare's seven steps of meta-ethnography will be used. Ethics and dissemination Because there will be no collection of primary data, this systematic review is exempt from the need that gets ethical approval. The findings of the review will be made public by publishing them in scholarly journals and presenting them at scientific conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023387534
medicine, general & internal