Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Community Engaged Scholars Programme (CES-P), PPI Ignite, National University of Ireland, Galway Background Despite the well-established benefits of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation, programme uptake rates remain suboptimal. Delivering cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the community offers an alternative model of care that may help address the challenges that exist around uptake and accessibility of CR. Yet in comparison to traditional hospital based CR programmes less is known about the enablers and barriers that may be unique to attending community based CR programmes. Purpose This study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to attending and completing a community-based CR programme from the patient perspective. Methods Individuals who were referred to a 12 week, interdisciplinary, multi-component community-based CR programme were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews. Reasons for attending or not attending the programme and for completing or not completing the full programme were discussed. Purposeful sampling was used to obtain variation in age, gender, and level of engagement with the programme. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using framework analysis guided by the Capability Opportunity Motivation (COM B) Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework, to explore initial attendance and programme completion. Results Data saturation was achieved with sixteen participants. The majority of the identified barriers and enablers were common to both initial programme attendance and completion of programme. Having the social opportunity to receive support from peers, family members and staff was seen as an important enabler. While ease of access to a programme based in the community enabled attendance and completion, for some, distance to the cardiac rehabilitation centre was a barrier. Further barriers related to capability issues regarding poor physical health, time, work commitments and travel. Key motivational enablers included, beliefs around consequences, improved health status, knowledge, goals, intentions and personality. Identity was an important determinant of attendance as participants discussed their understanding of "what am I doing here?" Some participants identified themselves as the type of person who would benefit from the programme and others did not. For example, some felt the programme would suit those who needed motivation to enhance their health and some felt the programme was more or less suited to people of different ages and fitness levels. Conclusion The results suggest that interventions to enhance attendance at community-based CR need to address multiple factors related to capability, opportunity and motivation. While there is no one model of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation that will meet the needs of all patients, patients should be offered community based programmes as part of a choice of options that fit their needs and personal preferences.

Perspectives and Experiences of Cardiac Rehabilitation after Stroke—A Qualitative Study

Perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in patients who had a stroke: a protocol for a qualitative study review

Cardiac Rehabilitation practitioners' views on patients' psychological needs: a qualitative study

Exploring perceptions of stroke survivors and caregivers about secondary prevention: a longitudinal qualitative study

Experience of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: a Qualitative Study

Exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders on the design and delivery of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for people post-stroke

Co-Designed Cardiac Rehabilitation for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke (CARESS): A Pilot Program Evaluation

A National Health Service Hospital's cardiac rehabilitation programme: a qualitative analysis of provision

What am I doing here? Enablers and barriers to community-based cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a qualitative study utilising a behavioural science approach

Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of CVD: time to think about cardiovascular health rather than rehabilitation

Cardiac rehabilitation: the gateway for secondary prevention

Usability and Acceptability of a Novel Secondary Prevention Initiative Targeting Physical Activity for Individuals after a Transient Ischaemic Attack or “Minor” Stroke: A Qualitative Study

Cardiac rehabilitation: referral and barriers

Meeting stroke survivors’ perceived needs: a qualitative study of a community-based exercise and education scheme

Mechanisms and benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in individuals with stroke: emerging role of its impact on improving cardiovascular and neurovascular health

Factors associated with community reintegration in the first year after stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis

Navigating recovery: A qualitative interview study of patients’ experiences of a structured group-based educational programme after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke

Exploring Social Support for Women Coping with a Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme after Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Cardiac Rehabilitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Potential for Digital Technology to Support Physical Activity Maintenance: Qualitative Study

Transient Ischemic Attack and Mild Stroke Participant Perspectives on Barriers and Enablers to Participation in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation

A New Era in Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery: Research Gaps, Questions, Strategies, and Priorities