Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single supra-wrist transverse incision assisted by a head-mounted cold light source and binocular loupe on postoperative pain in carpal tunnel syndrome, and to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this surgical approach on postoperative carpal volar pain and hand function recovery.Methods:From June 2019 to September 2020, 40 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome admitted to our department were randomly treated by the traditional inter-thenar longitudinal incision (longitudinal incision group) and a single supra-wrist transverse incision (transverse incision group). The relief degree of skin numbness in the median innervation area and the motor function of thenar muscle were observed. At 1, 14, 30, 90 and 180 days after operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the postoperative pain of the patients, the Von Frey fiber was used to detect the pain threshold at the volar wrist skin test points, and the correlation between the two surgical approaches and pain degree was analyzed. The time of normal use of the affected hand after operation was recorded and the effect of two surgical approaches on the functional recovery rate was evaluated.Results:All the patients were followed up. The postoperative numbness symptoms of the two groups were significantly reduced compared with preoperative symptoms, and the nocturnal-anaesthesia symptoms disappeared. The function of thenar muscle was the same as preoperative, and no exacerbation of symptoms occurred. The mean postoperative VAS of the longitudinal incision group and the transverse incision group at 1, 14, 30, 90 and 180 days were 3.9, 2.7, 2.0, 1.8, 0.8 and 2.4, 1.3, 0.7, 0.6, 0.4, respectively. The average pain thresholds of Von Frey filaments in the two groups were 7.6, 56.7, 115.5, 202.7 and 256.8 g, and 37.5, 94.6, 184.0, 269.5 and 300.0 g. There was no significant difference in VAS and Von Frey filament between the two groups. The mean days of normal use after surgery in the longitudinal incision group and the transverse incision group were 12.3 and 4.7 days, respectively, which showed statistically significant difference ( P< 0.05). Conclusion:The single supra-wrist transverse incision approach assisted by a head-mounted cold light source and binocular loupe could be used to perform median nerve release to treat carpal tunnel syndrome safely and effectively. The design of the incision can avoid the volar wrist skin stress area and further avoid the risk of injury to the volar carpal cutaneous nerve, which can accelerate the functional recovery of the affected hand.

Comparative Study of Carpal Tunnel Release by Limited Incision and Traditional Open Technique in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Comparison of longitudinal open incision and two-incision techniques for carpal tunnel release

Limited Open Carpal Tunnel Release Through a Small Palmar Incision-Experience in the Usage of a New Instrument-The Indiana Carpal Tunnel Tome

Comparison of early clinical outcome in carpal tunnel release - mini-open technique with palmar incision vs. endoscopic technique with wrist crease incision

Modified mini-incision surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: Technique and clinical outcome

Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications

Clinical Outcome of Endoscopically Assisted Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release

A comparative study of carpal tunnel release through three kinds of small incision for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

Comparing endoscopic and conventional surgery techniques for carpal tunnel syndrome: A retrospective study

Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A prospective comparative study of surgical release of carpal tunnel syndrome with and without flexor tenosynovectomy

Intraindividual comparison between open and endoscopic release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic release versus mini-open release for carpal tunnel syndrome

“A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF OPEN CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE SURGERY VS LOCAL STEROID INJECTION FOR CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME”

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Evaluation on Clinical Therapeutic Effect of Small Incision Releasing of Transverse Carpal Ligament in Treatment of Mild and Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Anatomic and Clinical Study of a New Surgical Procedure with Volar Single-Portal Approach for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Revision Carpal Tunnel Release with Endoscopic Technique: Clinical Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings

Surgical Interventions for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Evaluation of the effect of a single supra-wrist transverse incision for relief the postoperative pain in carpal tunnel syndrome

State of the art review. Complications after carpal tunnel release