Abstract:ObjectiveCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy, and endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) is one of the minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of CTS. Based on the shortcomings of ECTR, we designed the "Modified Soft Tissue Release Kit" to assist the endoscopic operation. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic treatment of CTS using this kit. MethodsThis retrospective review included 57 patients (86 wrists) who underwent ECTR using the "Modified Soft Tissue Release Kit" at our department between January 2017 and August 2019. Three scale scores (i.e., Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QDASH]; Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire [BCTSQ]: symptom severity [BCTSQ-SS] and functional status [BCTSQ-FS]) were recorded to assess hand function and symptoms preoperatively, 1 month postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. We also asked patients to answer a satisfaction question during follow-up. Pre- and post-operation scores were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman's rank-order correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between scale scores and patient satisfaction. ResultsA total of 55 patients (83 wrists) were followed up, with an average follow-up of 27.2 +/- 9.3 months. The median preoperative QDASH score was 45.5; the scores at 1 month postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and the last follow-up were 4.5, 0, and 0, respectively, with a significant decrease noted compared with the preoperative scores (P < 0.001). The median preoperative BCTSQ-SS and BCTSQ-FS scores were 3.3 and 2.8, respectively; the scores at 1 month postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and the last follow-up were 1.2, 1.0, and 1.0, and 1.1, 1.0, and 1.0, respectively, all of which decreased significantly compared with the preoperative scores (P < 0.001). The incidence of nerve injury was 0. The incidence of pillar pain was 0 at the last follow-up. One patient showed no improvement in hand symptoms and function postoperatively, and two patients showed long-term recurrence despite postoperative symptom remission. Approximately 94.5% (52/55) of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome. ConclusionsECTR with the "Modified Soft Tissue Release Kit" can significantly relieve symptoms and improve function in patients with CTS, with significant short- and mid-term efficacy and high safety.

State of the art review. Complications after carpal tunnel release

Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications

Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Past, Present, and Future Directions

Surgical Interventions for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Surgical outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in 100 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Complications of carpal tunnel surgery

Revision Carpal Tunnel Release with Endoscopic Technique: Clinical Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings

Revision Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: An Update on Technique and Outcomes

Causes of Iatrogenic Median Nerve Injury after Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

458 Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: An Umbrella Review and a Meta-Analysis

Limited Open Carpal Tunnel Release Through a Small Palmar Incision-Experience in the Usage of a New Instrument-The Indiana Carpal Tunnel Tome

A Retrospective Clinical Study of Endoscopic Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome using the Modified Soft Tissue Release kit

Surgical Technique for Performing Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release without Converting to an Open Technique, and Analysis of the Reasons for Conversion

Comparing endoscopic and conventional surgery techniques for carpal tunnel syndrome: A retrospective study

Complications after subfascial carpal tunnel release

State of the art review. Upper extremity revision nerve compression surgery

Effectiveness and Safety of Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression

Endoscopic Versus Open Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Postoperative Complications in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Outcome of Endoscopically Assisted Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release

Nerve complication produced by endoscopic releasing of carpal tunnel