Abstract:Purpose: This study analyzes the long-term postoperative symptoms and functional outcomes of patients who underwent either traditional open (single-incision) or 2-incision carpal tunnel release (CTR). Because 2-incision CTR preserves the superficial nerves and subcutaneous tissue between the thenar and hypothenar eminences, it may account for fewer postoperative symptoms and improved functional recovery. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent either open or 2-incision CTR for isolated carpal tunnel syndrome between 2005 and 2008 by a single surgeon. Patients with a history of hand trauma or confounding comorbidities were excluded. We mailed a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire and a Brigham and Women's Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BWCTQ) to all eligible participants. Data from the completed questionnaires were analyzed using independent t-tests and Pearson's correlation. Significance was set at p = .05. Results: A total of 82 patients (106 hands; 27 men and 55 women; mean age, 60.5 y) were eligible to participate. Of these, 51 patients (63 hands; 20 men and 31 women; mean age, 61.1 y) responded (62% response rate). The mean duration of follow-up was 22 months (range, 12-37 mo; SD 7.3 mo). The 2-incision group mean BWCTQ Symptom Severity Scale score (1.13, SD 0.25) was significantly lower than the open group mean Symptom Severity Scale score (1.54, SD 0.70, p = .001). The 2-incision group mean BWCTQ Functional Status Scale score (1.24, SD 0.51) was significantly lower than the open group mean Functional Status Scale score (1.71, SD 0.76, p = .008). The 2-incision group mean DASH score (5.10, SD 12.03) was significantly lower than the open group mean DASH score (16.28, SD 19.98, p = .01). Conclusions: Patients treated with 2-incision CTR reported statistically significantly less severe long-term postoperative symptoms and improved functional status compared with patients treated with traditional open CTR. Future prospective studies with objective measures are needed to further investigate the difference in outcomes found between these 2 CTR techniques. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Complications after subfascial carpal tunnel release

Complications of carpal tunnel surgery

State of the art review. Complications after carpal tunnel release

Limited Open Carpal Tunnel Release Through a Small Palmar Incision-Experience in the Usage of a New Instrument-The Indiana Carpal Tunnel Tome

[Double incision for operation of carpal tunnel syndrome--14 years experience]

Surgical Interventions for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Normal Palmar Anatomy and Variations That Impact Median Nerve Decompression

Revision Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: An Update on Technique and Outcomes

Effectiveness and Safety in Closed Mini-Transverse Incision with Hydro-Dissection Technique in Carpal Tunnel Release: A Cadaveric Study

Prevalence of anatomic variations encountered in elective carpal tunnel release

Endoscopic assisted carpal tunnel release

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: modification of Menon's technique and data from 191 cases

Incidental finding of a persistent median artery (palmar type) during a routine carpal tunnel decompression: a case report

"Dangerous" anatomic varieties of recurrent motor branch of median nerve

Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Not Just Another Trigger Finger

Anatomic Anomalies Encountered in 467 Open Carpal Tunnel Surgeries

Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by the entrapment of a bifid Lanz IIIA Type anatomical variant of median nerve: A case report and systematic literature review

A prospective comparative study of surgical release of carpal tunnel syndrome with and without flexor tenosynovectomy

Clinical Outcome of Endoscopically Assisted Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release

Comparison of longitudinal open incision and two-incision techniques for carpal tunnel release