AUTHOR, VIEWER AND READER OF THE DRAMA AT THE RECEPTION OF THE F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY
N. G. Mikhnovets,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2023-4-50-65
2023-01-01
Culture and Text
Abstract:The article shows that one of the subjects of reception of Mikhail and Fyodor Dostoevsky in the critical analysis of “The Thunderstorm” Drama in Five Acts by A. N. Ostrovsky (1860), dedicated to the dramaturgy of A. N. Ostrovsky, was the specificity of drama as a type of literature. It is emphasized that critics have undertaken a comparison of the strategies of the epic writer and the playwright, the activities of the reader of the epic-narrative work and the viewer, as well as the reader of the drama and the viewer. It was revealed that the focus of their attention was the difference in the perception of a dramatic work by the viewer and the reader. The reception of the Dostoevskys is described, which is of a theoretical nature; according to it, the playwright creates a “ready-made” character, the expression of which is manifested in the development of dramatic action. It is emphasized that, according to critics, the logic of the character’s actions must be carefully thought out and justified by the author in advance, so that during the performance it can be immediately open and understandable to the viewer. The viewer is simultaneously involved with the character in the dynamics of the development of the action; emotions are dominant in his perception; the playwright should not excite the “mind and imagination” of the viewer. The viewer will be required to work with imagination, but only in terms of scenography: such imagination will have the nature of an addition to what is succinctly outlined by the playwright. On the one hand, the reader of a dramatic text approaches the reader of an epic-narrative work, but in contrast to the viewer, he is more analytical than emotional. On the other hand, the possibilities of dialogue with the author (compared to the reader of an epic-narrative work) are narrowed for both the viewer and the reader of the dramatic text. It has been suggested that the Dostoevskys relied on the theory of drama by G. V. F. Hegel and his follower V. G. Belinsky. The article argues that F. M. Dostoevsky in his further work returned to the provisions from the critical analysis of A. N. Ostrovsky’s dramaturgy and developed them. It is shown that in the theatrical chapters of “Notes from the House of the Dead” and “Winter Notes on Summer Impressions”, as well as in the draft sketch “On the People’s Theater “Petrushka””> the writer examined the perception of the audience in a variety of ways: in psychological, social, ideological, aesthetic aspects. In the 1870s. F. M. Dostoevsky continued to be interested in the question of the differences between different types of art, while his interest in the deep nature of the general emotional reaction of the auditorium intensified