Abstract:Introduction L’échelle PANAS est l’instrument le plus largement utilisé pour mesurer les affects positifs et négatifs. Objectif L’échelle abrégée « Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule » (B-PANAS ; 10 items) est développée en comparaison avec les versions courtes Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (PANAS-SF ; Kercher, 1992) et International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF ; Thompson, 2007). Méthode Trois études réalisées auprès de 1047 adultes (échantillon 1=201 étudiants, échantillon 2=319 personnes actives, échantillon 3=527 personnes adultes) ont conduit à l’élaboration de l’échelle B-PANAS ainsi qu’à la comparaison de la structure factorielle, de la cohérence interne et de la validité de construit des trois versions courtes. Résultats L’échelle B-PANAS démontre des propriétés psychométriques robustes, contrairement aux autres versions courtes. La structure bidimensionnelle de l’échelle B-PANAS est répliquée dans les trois études tout en étant invariante selon l’âge et le sexe. La cohérence interne est attestée par tous les indicateurs de fiabilité. Le réseau nomologique est équivalent à celui de l’échelle PANAS en matière de corrélations avec des instruments représentant des indicateurs d’évaluation cognitive que sont la Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), le Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) et la Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985). Conclusion Cette recherche permet de disposer d’une échelle valide destinée à mesurer brièvement les Affects Positifs et les Affects Négatifs en langue française. Introduction The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects. Objective The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007). Method Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1=201 students, sample 2=319 working people, sample 3=527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales. Results The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985). Conclusion This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.

Measuring affect in daily life: A multilevel psychometric evaluation of the PANAS-X across four ecological momentary assessment samples.

Examining the Within- and Between-Person Structure of a Short Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: A Multilevel and Dynamic Approach.

Initial Validation of an Ecological Momentary Assessment Measure of Self-Efficacy to Manage Negative Emotions

Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

The Positive and Negative Rumination Scale: Development and Preliminary Validation

Daily life affective dynamics as transdiagnostic predictors of mental health symptoms: An ecological momentary assessment study

Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)

Longitudinal associations of daily affective dynamics with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms

Everyday Social Interactions and Intra-Individual Variability in Affect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies

Applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale in Chinese

L’échelle Positive and Negative Affect Schedule abrégée en langue française : développement, validation et comparaison de ses propriétés psychométriques avec les autres versions courtes

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded in 660 college students

Dysphoria and well-being in daily life: Development and validation of ecological momentary assessment scales.

The expression of affective temperaments in daily life

Affect Dynamics as Predictors of Symptom Severity and Treatment Response in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Evidence for Specificity

Exploring the Utility of a Real‐Time Approach to Characterising Within‐Person Fluctuations in Everyday Stress Responses

Chinese version of the international positive and negative affect schedule short form: factor structure and measurement invariance

A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably?

The daily association between positive affect and psychotic experiences in individuals along the early stages of the psychosis continuum

Aberrant positive affect dynamics in individuals with subthreshold depression: Evidence from laboratory and real-world assessments

Accelerometry-Based Physical Activity and Affective Responses to Daily Stressors: An Analysis of the AAPECS Study