Abstract:The purpose of the study is to consider the problems of ensuring the admissibility of evidence obtained in the course of monitoring the commission of an offence in criminal proceedings concerning crimes in the sphere of official activities. Attention is focused on the fact that the institute of secret investigative (search) actions has a double operational-search and criminal procedural content, since operational-search measures were the basis of secret (investigative) search measures by transforming the procedure for their implementation, which differs in the subjects and directions of further use of the information obtained. It is noted that the complex and underinvestigated procedural essence of control over the commission of crimes causes problems in ensuring the admissibility of evidence obtained during its conduct. It was found out that the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine defines a special criterion for the inadmissibility of evidence obtained during the control over the commission of a crime as a result of provoking a person to commit this crime by law enforcement agencies. Based on the analysis of materials of criminal proceedings, it is established that provocation of a crime is often a circumstance that excludes the admissibility of evidence, and becomes the basis for passing acquittals. It is proved that, according to the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, provocation of a crime exists when law enforcement officers do not limit themselves to passively establishing the circumstances of a person's possible commission of a crime in order to collect relevant evidence and, if there are grounds for it, bring a person to justice, but incite that person to commit a crime, undermining the principle of fairness of proceedings. The study argues for the need to apply criteria for distinguishing permissible interference and provocation in the course of monitoring the commission of a crime, which are formed according to the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Typical violations of the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law during control over the commission of a crime are considered, which entails, in particular, an insufficient level of regulation by departmental bylaws of the procedure for conducting and recording secret investigative (search) actions. Such violations based on the results of the analysis of investigative and judicial practice include: 1) provocation of a crime – cases when officials involved, who are either employees of security agencies, or persons acting on their behalf, do not limit their actions only to the investigation of criminal proceedings in essence in an implicit way, but influence the subject to commit a crime that would otherwise not have been committed, in order to make it possible to detect a crime, that is, to obtain evidence and open criminal proceedings (in accordance with the practice of the European Court of Human Rights); 2) lack of proper procedural documents in the materials of criminal proceedings certifying the right of operational employees to exercise control over the commission of a crime; 3) violations in the choice of methods and procedures for recording the progress and information obtained during the control over the commission of a crime. It is summed up that the imperfection of normative regulation of control over the commission of a crime in the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and subordinate acts leads to procedural and tactical errors on the part of the prosecution in the process of conducting them. In turn, this leads to the inadmissibility of using the information obtained in court proceedings when proving it. As a result, the efforts and resources of the law enforcement system are nullified, and the constitutional rights of a person not to be subjected to criminal punishment are violated until the guilt is legally proven

COERCION AS A SIGN OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES OF SPECIAL STATE BODIES

Legal regulation of the use of coercive measures by personnel of the state border service of Ukraine during the detention of persons who have committed a criminal offense

THE ROLE OF THE GENERAL SUBJECTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION DURING COVERT INVESTIGATIVE (SEARCH) ACTIVITIES (ACTIONS)

Provision of Qualified Legal Assistance to Individuals Subjected To Covert Operational Investigative Measures in Cases Where These Activities Take Public Forms

Recognition of inadmissibility of evidence obtained in the course of monitoring the commission of an offence in criminal proceeding in the field of official activities

Complicity as an independent crime in Russian Сriminal Law and features of its legislative regulation

Interference with the activities of a defense counsel or representative of a person: criminal law and criminology dimension.

Criminal-legal measures of special prevention of violent encroachments and their realisation by the police at interbranch law competition

Problems of legal construction and practice of implementation of the norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation on the protection of individual rights in criminal proceedings

Civil law problems of contractual relations in the framework of interaction between detectives and law enforcement agencies

Peculiarities of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption Activities under Martial Law

Legality and Validity of Property Seizure in the Investigation of a Criminal Case

On freedom of will, coercion, manipulation in philosophy, psychology and law: towards the formulation of the problem

The facets of lawful and criminally punishable use of physical force, special means and firearms by police officers (based on the materials of judicial practice)

On the Question of Correlation of Criminal Procedure and Penal Enforcement Legislation

THE PHENOMENON OF VIOLENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MORALITY AND LAW

FORMS OF INTERACTION AND COORDINATION BY THE PROSECUTOR OF THE PROCESS OF ENSURING THE SECURITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Priority areas of police bodies’ activity in ensuring the citizens’ rights in the conditions of martial law legal regime in Ukraine

Features of interaction between law enforcement agencies during the investigation of criminal offenses according to international standards

TOPICAL ISSUES OF PROTECTING THE RIGHTS AND LEGITIMATE INTERESTS OF THE ACCUSED IN CORRUPTION CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING CONFIDANTS (REGARDING THE PROCEDURE FOR ATTRACTING A CONFIDANT BY AN AUTHORIZED ENTITY)

CURRENT PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE STATUS OF A SPECIALIST IN THE CONTEXT OF INTRODUCING CHANGES TO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW