Verification of the Effectiveness of a Fire Hose Backpack in Areas Fire Trucks have Difficulty Accessing

Jung-seung Park,Seong-Jun Kim,Kyoung-Ha Chun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.db6da288
2022-10-31
Fire science and engineering
Abstract:The research aims to verify the effectiveness of firefighting hose backpacks through a comparative analysis of a firefighting hose backpack and conventional firefighting hose in an area difficult to access with a fire truck. The research, which targets 24 firefighters, was conducted as a random cross experiment. To this end, the firefighters were divided into 2 groups: one group comprised 12 firefighters with firefighting hose backpacks and the other 12 firefighters with conventional firefighting hoses. The purpose was to test the total time required to extinguish a fire and firefighters’ degree of physical tiredness. In the number of steps, the group with firefighting hose backpacks walked 1109.63 steps less than the group with conventional firefighting hoses (p = < .001). Furthermore, in the total time taken to spread out the hoses and extinguish the fire, the group with firefighting hose backpacks performed on average 674.75 s faster than the other group in both tasks, respectively. Regarding heart rates and lactic acid production, the group with firefighting hose backpacks had on average 23 fewer pulses (p = < .002) and produced on average of 3.14 mmol/L less (p = < .049) lactic acid than the other group with conventional firefighting hoses. An additional verification experiment showed that the hose spreading time was shortened by 81% and the speed of discharge doubled. In addition, the operating pressure for an appropriate discharge of water was analyzed to be 0.5 MPa for 100–200 m, 0.8 MPa for 300 m, and 0.95 MPa for 400–600 m. Therefore, firefighting hose backpacks should be encouraged for use in areas difficult to access with a fire truck to rapidly extinguish the fire and reduce the tiredness of firefighters.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?