Validity of submaximal aerobic capacity and strength tests in firefighters

W Hart,D Taylor,D C Bishop

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae004

2024-02-21

Occupational Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Background Typically, the fitness of UK firefighters is assessed via submaximal estimate methods due to the low demands on time, money, expertise and equipment. However, the firefighter-specific validity of such testing in relation to maximum aerobic capacity (V ̇O2max) and particularly muscular strength is not well established. Aims To examine the validity of submaximal methods to estimate V ̇O2max and maximal strength in operational firefighters. Methods Twenty-two full-time operational firefighters (3 female) completed same-day submaximal (Chester Step Test; CST) and maximal (treadmill) assessments of V ̇O2max, with a sub-sample of 10 firefighters (1 female) also completing submaximal and maximal back-squat (i.e. one repetition maximum; 1RM) assessments. All participants then completed the Firefighter Simulation Test (FFST) within 2–4 days. Results CST underestimated actual V ̇O2max by 1.4 ml·kg–1·min–1 (~3%), although V ̇O2max values were positively correlated (r = 0.61, P < 0.01) and not significantly different. Estimated V ̇O2max values negatively correlated with FFST performance (r = –0.42). Predicted 1RM underestimated actual 1RM by ~2%, although these values were significantly correlated (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) and did not significantly differ. The strongest predictive model of FFST performance included age, body mass index, and direct maximal measures of 1RM and V ̇O2max. Conclusions Submaximal back-squat testing offers good validity in estimating maximum firefighter strength without exposure to the fatigue associated with maximal methods. The CST provides a reasonably valid and cost-effective V ̇O2max estimate which translates to firefighting task performance, although the error observed means it should be used cautiously when making operational decisions related to V ̇O2max benchmarks.

public, environmental & occupational health

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the effectiveness of submaximal testing methods in evaluating firefighters' maximal oxygen uptake (\(\dot{V}O_2\max\)) and lower limb maximal strength (1RM), comparing them with direct maximal testing methods, and examining the relationship between these test results and firefighter task simulation test (FFST) performance.

Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following points:
1. **Validation of the Chester Step Test (CST)**: The study found that CST underestimated the actual \(\dot{V}O_2\max\) value by approximately 1.4 ml·kg\(^{-1}\)·min\(^{-1}\), but there was a significant positive correlation between the two. Although the error is within an acceptable range, caution should be exercised when making operational decisions related to \(\dot{V}O_2\max\) benchmarks.
2. **Effectiveness of the Submaximal Squat Test**: The study proposed a novel submaximal squat test method using laser optical equipment to estimate lower limb maximal strength. The results showed that this method effectively estimated firefighters' maximal strength and was highly correlated with direct maximal test results, with the error within an acceptable range.
3. **Factors Predicting FFST Performance**: The strongest predictive model included age, body mass index (BMI), directly measured maximal strength (1RM), and \(\dot{V}O_2\max\). These factors could predict FFST performance time well, whether based on submaximal or direct maximal test data.

In conclusion, the paper empirically validated the effectiveness of submaximal testing methods in assessing firefighters' physical fitness and highlighted issues that need attention in practical applications.