Abstract:On October 24, 2018 the Italian Constitutional Court held that the absolute ban on assisted suicide provided for by Art. 580 of the Italian criminal code is unconstitutional under certain conditions. On the one hand, this Article «serves the purpose of protecting interests that are worthy of protection by the legal system» (p. 6), such as life and the protection of weak and vulnerable people. On the other hand, in specific situations like the one in the DJ Fabo's case, the assistance to die «may seem to the sick person to be the only way out of being kept alive by artificial methods that are no longer desired, and which he or she has the right to refuse» (p. 8). In particular the Court has set four conditions under which the absolute prohibition of suicide assistance can turn to be unconstitutional, and namely in those cases in which «assisted persons are (a) affected by an illness that is incurable and (b) causes physical or psychological suffering, which they find absolutely intolerable, and who are (c) kept alive by means of life support treatments, but remain (d) capable of making free and informed decisions» (p. 8). In such a situation the absolute ban on suicide assistance obliges the patient to «undergo a slower process, in a scenario that corresponds less well to the patient's vision of a dignified death and which is marked by more pain and suffering for the people close to the patient» (p. 9). Being aware of the impact and scope of its remarks and of the values at stake, the Court decided not to immediately declare the unconstitutionality of art. 580 of the criminal code, but rather to postpone the official discussion of the questions of constitutionality to the hearing on September 24, 2019. In a «"collaborative" and "dialogical"» perspective, the Court thus called upon the Parliament to regulate a subject which is at the «intersection between values of primary importance, the balancing of which presupposes, in a direct and immediate way, choices that the legislator is, first of all, authorized to make» (p. 11). As already known, the Parliament has not passed a law on assisted suicide so far; the Court will therefore decide at the hearing on September 24 how to amend what has already defined as a «unconstitutional regulatory scheme» (p. 11). Against this background and considering the reasoning of the Court in December 2018, the Authors of this Document - legal scholars and professionals with long-standing experience in these topics - decided to open an interdisciplinary discussion on the main legal end-of-life issues. Starting from the Order but without limiting the analysis to it, the Working Group met on a monthly basis at the University of Trento and with the support of the Jean Monnet BioTell Project, addressing and studying in depth the large number of tricky issues raised by the Order of the Constitutional Court and linked to a possible Parliament decision. The results of these discussions have been gathered and developed in the Document together with some operational proposals, offering a "constitutionally oriented" and scientific grounded understanding of end-of-life issues. The Working Group thus aimed to contribute to the public debate suggested by the Court, which must be truly informed and plural due to the impact on institutional choices. On September 25, the Constitutional Court ruled the impunity of those who foster the suicide under the conditions expressed in the Court press release reporting the Court's judgment.

Negazionismo e libertà di espressione: dalla sentenza Perinçek c. Svizzera alla nuova aggravante prevista nell'ordinamento Italiano. (Genocide Denial and Freedom of Expression: from the Perincek v. Switzerland Judgement to the New Aggravating Circumstance Introduced in Italian Criminal Law)

Aiding and Abetting Suicide: The Current Debate in Italy

Criminalization of denial of the genocide of the peoples of the USSR as an infringement on historical truth

Italy and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments on Third States’ Tort Liability for Sponsoring Terrorism

DEVELOPMENTS IN ITALIAN CRIMINAL LAW ON CYBER-VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

Struggle in Favour of a Criminal Law as an ‘ultima ratio’. Critical Observations on the Criminalisation Obligations Arising from the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Principle of Subsidiarity

Recent Developments in Italian Constitutional-Criminal Law

Conflict and crime. Restorative justice in Italy

Criminal Law and Neuroscience: Theory and Practice in the Italian Perspective

Physician-Patient Relationship, Assisted Suicide and the Italian Constitutional Court

Medically assisted suicide in Italy: the recent judgment of the Constitutional Court

[Medical assistence to die, and law]

The Reform of Italian Law on Cultural Property Export and Its Implications for the “Definitional Debate”: Closing the Gap with the European Union Approach or Cosmetics? Some Systemic Considerations from a Criminal Law Perspective

Legal English. The UN Convention on Genocide as a Domain-Specific Text

Criminal liability models and criminal participation in the digital environment: A modern challenge in the perspective of Italian constitutionalism

A ‘crimmigrant ban’? Global mobility, urban (in)security and the changing dynamics of judicial practices

Keep silence for yourself: The protection of the right to silence in the Italian criminal justice system

Criminal Law And Artificial Intelligence: Perspective From Italian And European Experience

"Love Them to Death": Dutch and Italian Experiences of (Assisted) Suicide, and the Urgent Need for Human Solidarity

Stereotypes and prejudices in the legal representation of violence against women. A socio-cultural analysis of the judgments in the Italian courts

Penalization of genetic crimes