Abstract:Abstract Should we use the language of international criminal law (ICL) to discuss, analyze, and address Western policies of migration control? Such policies have included or resulted in indefinite and inhumane detention, deportations, including through practices of push- and pull-backs and numerous deaths of migrants attempting to cross land or sea borders. And yet, recourse to ICL's conceptual and rhetorical apparatus, often reserved for “unimaginable atrocities,” may seem ill-fitting and an emotive stretch of doctrine. Drawing from international strategic litigation practice on Australian and European policies, this article examines whether the legal concept of crimes against humanity can apply to the deaths, detention, and deportation of migrants, as part and consequence of Western policies of migration control. As migration control policies involve increasingly sophisticated practices of outsourcing and responsibility avoidance, I further ask whether the tools ICL has developed to describe system criminality can trace individual liability against the distance created by such policies. I also inquire into the potential that the transnational nature of migration and the spreading of anti-migration policies have in activating the jurisdiction of courts and the prioritization of the role of the International Criminal Court. Finally, I consider the danger of fetishizing an international punitive approach, before offering some thoughts that aim to bridge a critical approach to international criminal law with its use in meaningful strategic litigation. Throughout the Article, I argue that applying the categories of ICL to Western policies of migration control can contribute to revealing both the potential and the limits of the regime and its institutions, as well as the structures of asymmetry and injustice present both in anti-migration policies and in international criminal law itself.

A ‘crimmigrant ban’? Global mobility, urban (in)security and the changing dynamics of judicial practices

Controlling Immigrants: The Latent Function of Italian Administrative Orders

Crimmigration and the Australian Legal Lexicon: Reflecting on Border Control, Theory and the Lived Experience

Crimmigrating Narratives: Examining Third-Party Observations of US Detained Immigration Court

Internal bordering in the context of undeportability: Border performances in Italy

Crimmigration and the prison: Comparing trends in prison policy and practice in England & Wales and Norway

Arresting movement: The history of German immigration detention beyond the camp

Border control within Spanish prisons? Intersections between immigration control and imprisonment at the southern border of Europe

The Bologna-Barcelona axis between Criminal Law Dogmatics and Critical Sociology of punitive control. Hidden Continuities and Apparent Overcomings

Urban routines, spatial occupancy, and their effects on outdoor crime in Barcelona

Border town authorities and the multilevel politics of the ‘transit migrant’ emergency

Immigration and Crime: An International Perspective

La representación social de los migrantes durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Un estudio de caso italiano sobre narrativas hostiles y comunicación política visual

Paperwork performances

Bordered penality: Precarious membership and abnormal justice

International Criminal Law and the Violence against Migrants

Mixed-status informal couples in a cascading crisis. Immobilisation, mobilisation, and normalisation?

Immigration restriction and the transfer of cultural norms over time and boundaries: the case of religiosity

Migration and Security in the EU: Back to Fortress Europe?

Irrational rationalities and governmentality-effected neglect in immigration practice: Legal migrants' entitlements to services and benefits in the United Kingdom

How Inclusive Institutions Enforce Exclusive Immigration Rules: Mainstream Public Service Provision and the Implementation of a Hostile Environment for Irregular Migrants Living in Britain