Impact of Atrial Fibrillation and/or Flutter on in-Hospital Management and Outcomes in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Z A Dakhil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac056.050

IF: 8.526

2022-05-01

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and it is increasing in prevalence considering the aging of populations and the overlap of risk factors. It was reported by earlier studies that atrial fibrillation and/or flutter portend worse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Yet there is no data from Iraq regarding impact of these arrhythmias on prognosis of patients with NSTE-ACS. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-existing or new onset atrial fibrillation and/or flutter on in-hospital management and outcomes in an Iraqi cohort of patients with NSTE-ACS. Methods Patients with NSTE-ACS were prospectively included. GRACE risk score was calculated by the investigator with subsequent classification into low, intermediate and high GRACE risk class. Then the patients were classified into those who had pre-existing or new onset atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter (Patients with AF) group versus those with no atrial fibrillation nor atrial flutter (non-AF group). Results N=200, among whom AF was evident in 8.5%. Patients with AF were older (64.47±10.02 vs 58.22±11.79 years, p=0.025), they were females in 35.3% vs 29% in non-AF counterparts, p=0.58. There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding presence of hypertension, diabetes, prior history of ischemic heart disease (IHD) nor family history of IHD, however, AF group were smokers in 11.8% vs 36.6% in non-AF group, p=0.039. Patients with AF reported dyspnoea at presentation in 47.1% vs 27.9%. Patients with AF were at high GRACE risk class at presentation in 76.5% vs 28.4% in non-AF group, p<0.001. Patients with AF were referred less for catheterisation during index hospitalisation compared to non-AF counterparts (35.3% vs 72.1%, p=0.002). There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding days to catheterisation nor days of hospitalisation. There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding developing in-hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, persistent ischemic chest pain, nor in-hospital ventricular life-threatening arrhythmia (VT, VF or Complete heart block), however, patients with AF developed higher in-hospital stroke (5.9% vs 0.5%, p=0.034) and higher in-hospital death (11.8% vs 1.6%, p=0.011). Conclusion Patients with NSTE-ACS and concurrent AF presented at higher risk class at presentation and higher in-hospital stroke and in-hospital death compared to patients with no AF, yet those patients were catheterised less frequently during index hospitalisation. Larger studies are needed to assess the impact of AF on longer term prognosis in the setting of NSTE-ACS. More attention should be paid for this high-risk category of NSTE-ACS patients with more emphasis on following evidence-based guidelines regarding decision and timing of catheterisation in order to improve their outcomes.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems