The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure with Mid-range and Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients

Irina Mustafina,Seabrook Whyte,Stavros Stavrakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1271
IF: 6.779
2024-05-25
Heart Rhythm
Abstract:Background The combined effect of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) on clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) remains complex. Objective In this post-hoc analysis of the TOPCAT trial, we aimed to evaluate the impact of AF on clinical outcomes in patients with HF patients stratified by LVEF range. Methods A total of 3442 patients were included, stratified into three groups according to LVEF range: 1) HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF) - LVEF 45-50% (n=823); 2) HF with preserved LVEF (HFpEF) - LVEF 51-60% (n=1682); 3) HF with normal LVEF (HFnEF) - LVEF >60 % (n=937) and subdivided according to the presence of AF at enrollment. Cox regression analysis was used to define independent associations between AF and clinical outcomes. Results AF was prevalent in 38.6% in HFmrEF, 34.6% in HFpEF, and 33.7% in HFnEF (p=0.07). In each subgroup, AF was associated with worse primary outcome and HF hospitalizations, and worse cardiovascular mortality in HFpEF and HFnEF. The hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome in those with AF compared to sinus rhythm (SR) was 1.11 (1.01–1.22, p=0.03) in HFmrEF; 1.20 (1.11–1.28, p<0.001) in HFpEF; and 1.16 (1.05–1.28, p=0.004) in HFnEF. When LVEF was treated as a continuous variable, there was a linear negative association between LVEF and the effect of AF vs. SR for the primary endpoint and HF hospitalizations and a linear positive association for cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion Compared to SR, AF was independently associated with worse outcomes across all LVEF ranges.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?